Yes i do agree with Sarbajit roy and if UT is not in Central Govt Domain , Let Wajahath Give reasons why he and his team is Hearing Second appeals from Delhi . Let it passed on to the PMO and let PMO appoint Seprate Info Comms for Delhi . I suppose all his team mates will agree that there will be drastic reduction of Appeals and they can also relax
N vikramsimha , KRIA Katte ,& Trustee RTI Study Centre #12 Sumeru Sir M N Krishna Rao Road , Basvangudi < Bangalore 560004. --- On Mon, 2/3/09, sarbajit roy <[email protected]> wrote: From: sarbajit roy <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [rti_india] Help: RTI activist questions information panel order To: [email protected] Date: Monday, 2 March, 2009, 5:43 PM Thanks for the link Sidharth I think it is shocking that Mr Habibullah has not ticked off the DoPT for meddling in his domain, a-la the "file notings" controversy. This DoPT document is truly insidious and a section 18 Complaint is in order, so Sid you may do the needful. a) "singular" public authority wrt 6(3) b) UT admn NOT a Central Govt domain, etc Sarbajit On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 10:33 AM, Sidharth <sidharthbbsr@ gmail.com> wrote: > This might be the circular the TNSICs have referred in their decision. > > http://persmin. gov.in/WriteData /CircularNotific ation/ScanDocume nt/RTI/10_ > 2_2008-IR. pdf > > or http://tinyurl. com/ahugyo > > sidharth > Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Go to http://messenger.yahoo.com/invite/ [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
