Dear Freind , 
Since you have Marked your mail with your arguments in the matter to Both CCIC 
& CIC  at this juncture i request you to kindly see the following url Or the 
Site of Legal opinion in CIC Web site 
http://cic.gov.in/legal%20opinion.htm
where in an opnion on the writ jurdiction of the high courts are furnished by 
one Prof K K Nigam on 17/7/2007 itself . His Email ID is [email protected] 
Now my doubt is what is the Writ Jurdiction for CIC , can be construed that 
because the Original RTI application or Request  originated in a place other 
than delhi but only a final decesion was delivered in Delhi , which will be the 
cause of Action and which will be High Court -- Delhi or outside Delhi .
I have marked this mail to Prof.Nigam also

N vikramsimha , Trustee RTI Study Centre &
KRIA Katte , #12 Sumeru Sir M N Krishna Rao Road , Basvangudi < Bangalore 
560004.

--- On Wed, 25/3/09, abhi987 <[email protected]> wrote:


From: abhi987 <[email protected]>
Subject: [rti_india] Whether High Courts have jurisdiction over Orders passed 
under the RTI Act, 2005? An argument, A Poi
To: [email protected]
Cc: "wajahat" <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Date: Wednesday, 25 March, 2009, 11:25 PM






Dear Wajahat Habibullah, Shailesh Gandhi and All,

Whether High Courts have jurisdiction over Orders passed under the RTI Act, 
2005? An argument, A Point of View. 

1) Constitution of India supersedes all other laws in this country.

2) Parliament has come into existence by virtue of the Constitution of India. 
(Part XV –Elections – Article 324 to 329)

3) Having come into existence Parliamentarians have been conferred upon the 
powers to amend the Constitution itself, by way of addition, variation or 
complete repealing of any or all the Articles of the Constitution. 

In fact Article 368 (5) of the Constitution is very emphatic.

Article 368 (5) - “For the removal of doubts, it is hereby declared that there 
shall be no limitation whatever on the constituent power of Parliament to amend 
by way of addition, variation or repeal the provisions of this Constitution 
under this article.”

4) Right to Information Act, 2005 has been passed in the Parliament of India.

5) Sec. 22 of the RTI Act, 2005 states that it is to have an overriding effect 
over all other existing laws prevalent in the country.

6) Sec. 23 of the RTI Act, 2005 categorically bars the jurisdiction of Courts 
in respect of any order/s passed under it's Act.

7) Sec. 22 & 23 of the RTI Act, 2005 fall well within the meaning of power of 
Parliament to amend by way of addition and variation to the provisions of the 
Constitution under Article 368.

8) Article 329 of the Constitution is a precedent to Sec. 23 of the RTI Act, 
wherein jurisdiction of Courts have been particularly barred in electoral 
matters.

9) Hence,

By virtue of powers conferred to the Parliament under Article 368 of the 
Constitution and taking Article 329 as a precedent,

It can be reasonably inferred,

That by virtue of sec. 22 & 23 of the RTI Act,

The Articles 226, 226 A & 227 of the Constitution which defines the powers of a 
High Court within it's jurisdiction, stand amended to the extent of any orders 
passed under the RTI Act, 2005.

Especially Article 226 A w.e.f. 13-4-1978 particularly stands amended by virtue 
of RTI Act, 2005 w.e.f. 15-06-2005, because the RTI Act is recent.

[Article 226 A "Constitutional validity of Central laws not to be considered in 
proceedings under article 226."]

10) Hence,

No Court can entertain any suit, application or other proceeding in respect of 
any order made under this Act and no such order shall be called in question 
otherwise than by way of an appeal under this Act.

11) If the Courts were to entertain proceedings in respect of orders passed 
under the RTI Act, the road to information will become long and expensive. 

The author of the RTI Act had envisaged this and hence introduced sec. 22 & 23 
in the Act.

Link to above: http://www.rtiindia .org/forum/ blogs/abhi987/ 335-whether- 
high-courts- have-jurisdictio n-over-orders- passed-under- rti-act-2005- 
argument- point-view. html

Warm Regards,

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

















      Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Go to 
http://messenger.yahoo.com/invite/

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to