Here are my three:

1. What happened to the monthly disposal statistics for Jan and Feb 2009 on the 
CIC website ?
2. When will all the other 4 IC's publish their cause lists on the CIC website ?
3. NIC has finally linked the "Online filing" website with the CIC website - 
but why has it removed the facility for searching "Status of 
appeals/complaints" for those appeals/complaints filed traditionaly by snail 
mail/personally ?

PS: Mr Sarbajit, any information which is to be published suo motu, but is 
sought from the PA, needs to be accompanied by the due application fee (as per 
IC ANT) - please pay up

THIS POSTING HAS NO LEGAL IMPLICATIONS, THEREFORE NO SIGNED HARD COPY WLL 
FOLLOW - THE FAA OF CIC TO NOTE !

RTIwanted

--- On Tue, 3/31/09, Vikram Simha <[email protected]> wrote:

From: Vikram Simha <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [rti_india] Darkness in the CIC
To: [email protected]
Date: Tuesday, March 31, 2009, 5:16 PM











    
            Mr. Habibulla had assured that he will consider implementing peer 
Review , to ensure that all IC's stick to similar considerations and orders do 
not differ in interpretation and effect 



N vikramsimha ,Trustee RTI Study Centre & KRIA Katte , #12 Sumeru Sir M N 
Krishna Rao Road , Basvangudi < Bangalore 560004.



--- On Tue, 31/3/09, sroy1947 <sroy1...@yahoo. com> wrote:



From: sroy1947 <sroy1...@yahoo. com>

Subject: [rti_india] Darkness in the CIC

To: rti_in...@yahoogrou ps.com

Date: Tuesday, 31 March, 2009, 2:13 PM



Dear Friends,



Please use this thread to provide specific examples of where Mr.Habibullah' s 
personal intervention is required for larger public interest CIC administrative 
matters which benefit all RTI users.



My contribution: -



1) Mr H can give us the reasons why not a single order / decision of IC(MLS) 
for March 2009 is published on CIC website.



Since this is a section 4 query, We would appreciate a reply.



Sarbajit Roy



Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Go to http://messenger. 
yahoo.com/ invite/



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




 

      

    
    
        
         
        
        








        


        
        


      

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to