1) The monthly statistics are held up because IC(MLS) has taken a principled 
stand not to share his statistics (and decisions) with anyone other than 
parties. He is to be congratulated for this bold step which is firmly in the 
tradition of Quality over Quantity. IC(MLS) also knows that the orders he 
delivers are not to be placed in the public domain till such time as they 
become final (which involves being heard by a double bench).

2) As per a previous decision of CIC (versus High Court of Delhi) the cause 
list is not a document to be published under RTI. In any case there are 5 (not 
4) ICs who are refusing to upload their cause lists and at least one of them 
has politely told Mr H to get appointed a Registrar first. Also, the CIC's NIC 
backend still runs on a Microsoft platform (ie. open to Chinese hackers) and 
people like me who use FLOSS platforms are unable to see the cause list in any 
case.

3) I guess Mr H can answer your query no 3 better than me. The present system 
is not even telling me about online complaints I have filed for non-compliance.

Sarbajit

--- In [email protected], C K Jam <rtiwan...@...> wrote:
>
> Here are my three:
> 
> 1. What happened to the monthly disposal statistics for Jan and Feb 2009 on 
> the CIC website ?
> 2. When will all the other 4 IC's publish their cause lists on the CIC 
> website ?
> 3. NIC has finally linked the "Online filing" website with the CIC website - 
> but why has it removed the facility for searching "Status of 
> appeals/complaints" for those appeals/complaints filed traditionaly by snail 
> mail/personally ?
> 
> PS: Mr Sarbajit, any information which is to be published suo motu, but is 
> sought from the PA, needs to be accompanied by the due application fee (as 
> per IC ANT) - please pay up
> 
> THIS POSTING HAS NO LEGAL IMPLICATIONS, THEREFORE NO SIGNED HARD COPY WLL 
> FOLLOW - THE FAA OF CIC TO NOTE !
> 
> RTIwanted
> 


Reply via email to