Dear Mr S Roy, please unsubscribe me from this group. up mathur
--- On Thu, 5/7/09, sroy1947 <[email protected]> wrote: From: sroy1947 <[email protected]> Subject: [rti_india] Re: The group needs to control the communications from members and not be party to rumours/unsubstantiated allegations To: [email protected] Date: Thursday, May 7, 2009, 6:38 PM Dear Group, Himangshu raises some very valid points. 1) This group is not meant to circulate unsubstantiated / unsubstantiable propoganda / disinformation. 2) The lack of censorship / moderation at our PUBLICLY ACCESSIBLE group ought not to be misused. Posting to our group is a PRIVILEGE and not a Right. 3) As Mr Vaghela has represented himself to be an expert on this subject, we are allowing him sufficient time to back up his post (failing which his message will be deleted from our records). I firmly believe that Mr Vaghela (as a fellow RTI group Moderator) shall fully and publicly defend his post to Himangshu to the same standard he expects from others. 4) Mr Vaghela has raised an important issue about RTI if Mr Khosla's sister is Mr Pauls' wife who is slated to be an IC from media reports. 5) As regards a "screening commitee", this group now has YAHOO SPAMM control turned for maximum rejection. Many of Mr Vaghela's SPAMMY messages (the ones he CCs to 100's of people) are automatically rejected by Yahoo. However, in this case Mr Vaghela's post was to a very limited set of RTI groups which is why Yahoo allowed it to be posted directly. 6) I am given to understand that Mr Khosla continues on at MCA - as an OSD. Sarbajit --- In rti_in...@yahoogrou ps.com, Himangshu Vaish <hrva...@... > wrote: > > Dear Mr. Vaghela > > I am astonished to receive this mail where serious allegations are being > made on the net about a senior officer and even his brother-in-law is being > dragged in as if by correlation the brother-in-law has also done something > wrong. > > I would like to see what evidence you have and how the conclusions have been > arrived at. Has there been any complaint or police investigation; if not, > why not? > > We should have a screening committee to examine such issues before they are > widely circulated through the net, else anyone will be able to spread > falsehood through the medium of a communication channel designed for issues > connected with RTI. This will have adverse affects on the whole RTI > movement. > > Best wishes, > > H.R. Vaish > > On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 3:12 PM, Babubhai Vaghela <vaghel...@. ..>wrote: > > > > > > > Dear Members, > > Mr K K Paul, I understand, is corrupt IAS officer Mr Jitesh Khosla's > > brother-in-law. > > Jitesh Khosla, who is now finally shunted out as Joint Secretary Ministry > > of > > Corporate Affairs had played a dubious role in Satyam scam, by corrupt > > practices and illegalities declared BRPL-IOC amalgamation through. > > > > I happened to be one of the main key objector for BRPL-IOC amalgamation and > > had no. of opportunities to see myself personally the corrupt practices of > > Jitesh Khosla > > > > With warm regards, > > > > -- > > Babubhai Vaghela > > 202, Sarap, Opp Navjivan Press, > > Off Ashram Road, Ahmedabad - 380 014 > > M - 91 94276 08632 > > (Administrator - Google Group - Right to Information Act 2005) > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
