A person is remembered by their works. I will like to remember Rahul as an 
idealist fighting for what he believed in (exemplified by this letter below) - 
using RTI for Narmada waters for Gujarat against Aruna Roy and her Maoist 
friends - and not his later reversal where he joined forces with the same 
people he rails against here. I still prefer to believe in Rahul's original 
impression (and first impressions more often than not are correct) that one 
lone voice without media noise can still make a difference. Lets show Rahul 
that he was right.

<snip>
RSM:CIC:PMO:200604201
Ahmedabad, 20th April 2006

To,
Shri. Wajahat Habibullah
Chief Information Commissioner
Central Information Commission
Old JNU Campus,
Block IV, 5th Floor,
New Delhi-110067

Sirs,

Vide my email dated 18.04.2006 ref. RSM:CIC:PMO:200604181 sent on 7:03 PM that 
day, I had lodged a complaint of deemed refusal against the PIO of the Prime 
Minister's Office. Which am sure you are in receipt off (am still reproducing 
the same herebelow for your perusal). You would kindly note that my original 
request for information was faxed to Shri. Kamal Dayani, the designated PIO of 
the PMO on the 14th of April, I appealed and re-appealed to you on the 18th 
April. As of now, since my request for information, first appeal, and second 
appeal have gone unanswered, I hereby lodge my additional appeal to be kindly 
appended to the earlier one.

I had invoked section 7.1 of life and liberty sought information within 48 
hours, I have not received information, nor any communication either from the 
PIO nor the appellate, nor your office, with regards my request, appeal and 
second appeal. On a question of life and liberty if this is the level of 
laxity, apathy wherein even after (14-20 April), 9 days, approx. 216 hours 
there is no information, a common citizen seeking information, might as well 
take the dead body, perform funeral rituals, and the social
perfunctions thereafter and get the information as a consolation; after that it 
is not consolation but being salt being rubbed into their wounds.

One invokes the section in times of extreme cases, when I had sent my
complaint on 18th for the hearing scheduled for 19th, that it was not
taken into consideration is rather unfortunate. I was told by Mr. Gera, that it 
would be taken separately. I hereby seek to know (if required do let me know, I 
will send in a separate question along with fees) when would I get answers to 
my questions and also since the information being sought has not been provided 
within the timeframe of the section under which it was sought, be provided to 
me free of cost and penalties be imposed.

Thanking you in anticipation at the least of getting a reply,
information now that I have had to send in a second reminder is secondary and 
most unfortunate. Seems to an unassuming citizen like me, that without having 
support of biggies like NCPRI and Parivartan, one lone voice without the 
biggies and media hype cannot be heard, hope am wrong.

Regards,
Rahul Mangaonkar

--- In [email protected], Vikram Simha <vikramsimh...@...> wrote:
>
> Righitly said . Shri Rahul had Virtually Dominated TOI ,A'bad with each & 
> every piece of RTI News  where as Here in Blore we have struggle to Get 
> through with TOI just to Put up an Sucess Story in the Media .Hope there is 
> another "rahul" lurking in A'bad TOI as an "Raktha bija sura"
> 
> N vikramsimha ,Trustee RTI study Centre & KRIA Katte , #12 Sumeru Sir M N 
> Krishna Rao Road , Basvangudi < Bangalore 560004.
> 
> --- On Sat, 9/5/09, sroy1947 <sroy1...@...> wrote:
> 
> 
> From: sroy1947 <sroy1...@...>
> Subject: [rti_india] Sad demise of Shri Rahul Mangaonkar
> To: [email protected]
> Date: Saturday, 9 May, 2009, 4:00 PM
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Like the mainstream RTI movement, I was also shocked to learn of the passing 
> away of this talented individual.
> 
> Due to the unfortunate barricade erected by some misguided [Hum Janenge] 
> moderators (of whom Rahul was one) the censorship policy at that group did 
> not see fit to permit my fulsome tribute to him for publication there.
> 
> There is no need to reiterate that the public disgreement (which resulted in 
> my gagging on HJ) I had on interpretation of RTI laws was with the late 
> Masterji (founder of HJ) and not with his acolytes who run the group now - 
> many of whom contribute to keeping the RTI movement going. 
> 
> In future if any such unfortunate situation arises I hope that our members 
> (many of whom are common to groups such as HJ) shall include this group also 
> for their tributes /communications, especially as the struggle to keep RTI 
> afloat in the face of State opposition cuts across groupism, regionalism and 
> other similar affiliations.
> 
> In sorrow,
> Sarbajit
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>       From Chandigarh to Chennai - find friends all over India. Go to 
> http://in.promos.yahoo.com/groups/citygroups/
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>


Reply via email to