Dear Mr. Jain, Very well said.
On Mon, 25 May 2009 23:06:56 +0530 wrote >Since in previous mail, I had mentioned about Great Bal Gangadhar >Tilak. I wish to add more from wikipedia which is undoubtedly the >process of Judicial Reforms. > > From wikipedia >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bal_Gangadhar_Tilak >Gandhiji was a true follower of Tilak's legacy.There is almost a >continuation of the thought process from Tilak to Gandhi that shaped >the future of the independence movement that followed. He favored >political dialogue and discussions as a more effective way to obtain >political freedom for India. > > Views on Super >Intelligent Extra Ordinary Hihghly Talented IC's >While in contrast as per previous posts, Super Intelligent Extra >Ordinary Highly Talented (SIEOHT) Dr Suresh Vinayakrao Joshi of SIC >favours police action more than dialogue and discussions. Even when >US cargo ship was captured by Somalia Pirates, US Navy waited for >dialogues and discussions before action. Even in mental hospitals, >true physicians bear the brunt of violent mentally sick patients with >dialogues and discussions before injecting sedative drugs as last >resort. And judicial courts too have procedural flowchart, guidelines >as per rules and regulations. In fact finest International >Institutions have plenty to learn from these Highly learned IC's who >are simply egoist with their roots above ground in mid-air. > > From wikipedia >After Tilak's death on August 1st, 1920, on the first day of Gandhi's >first non-cooperation campaign, Gandhiji paid his respects at his >cremation in Mumbai, along with >20,000,000 people. Gandhiji called Tilak "The Maker of Modern India". >The court which convicted Tilak bears a plaque that says, " The >actions of Tilak has been justified as the right of every individual >to fight for his country. Those two >convictions have gone into oblivion -- oblivion reserved by history >for all unworthy deeds". > > Views sought from these >Super Intelligent Extra Ordinary Highly Talented IC's >Can Super Intelligent Extra Ordinary Highly Talented (SIEOHT) IC's Dr >Suresh Vinaykrao Joshi at SIC and IC Anugraha Narayan Tiwari with >distinctions and Harvard fellow from Weatherhead Center of >International Affairs at Cambridge at CIC justify the plaque publicly >for the court which convicted "The Maker of Modern India" ? One is >having Doctorate Degree and another highlights Distinction and First >Class First in University with tag of Harvard Fellowship at age of 48 >years? And indeed whatever these highly talented IC's write has to be >accepted with grace and honour by Harvard Center of International >Affairs, White House, International Court of Justice, Human Rights >Commissions, Interpol too. > >When country was burning with arson, rioting and terrorism what was >SIEOHT Dr Suresh Vinaykrao Joshi doing ? Was he sleeping ? Where was >his Josh in dealing with the ugly situation ? He could have shown his >braveness there as it was indeed trespassing by illegal immigrants >across border, rioting with latest sophisticated weapons, loss of >lives of citizens of various countries and loss over 1000 crores. In >fact situation was out of control from Mumbai Police and elite forces >had to deployed to deal with the situation. But SIEOHT Dr Suresh >Vinaykrao Joshi preferred to exhibit his talented josh with RTI Activists. > >If someone files RTI with Police as whose duty was at dockyard on >26/11 or who were on duty at Sarojini Market in New Delhi when bomb >blasts occurred, I am sure these SIEOHT IC's will call RTI >application as hypothetical and pass orders in favour of corrupt >police forces. > >And there is another suggestion - Before you enter the Maharashtra >SIC, better file the hearings schedule, timings with nearest police >station, Human Rights organizations, Civil Rights organizations, >Mumbai High Court, Governor's office and finally nearby hospitals & >trauma centers in case you may need medical treatment if you survive >the Josh of SIEOHT Dr Suresh Vinaykrao Joshi. Josh mein hosh kabhi nahi khona. > >Sanjiv Kumar Jain > >Access to information is our right and for that only this act came >into force probably under pressure from International Forums. > >[Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
