Dear Sarabjit, 
 
I pray and  hope by the Grace of God theses 10 not 11 as one had already walked 
away before the Police could arrive will riggle their way out, emminent 
criminal Lawyers
have come to their aid, and i am sure the tide will change. it is like what 
mumbai experienced just after 26/11, anger and sympthy wave across mumbai
 
Rgds
Leslie Almeida
 
 
 


--- On Sat, 5/30/09, sroy1947 <[email protected]> wrote:


From: sroy1947 <[email protected]>
Subject: [rti_india] Re: Fw: My Shailesh Gandhi versus CIC Shailesh Gandhi
To: [email protected]
Date: Saturday, May 30, 2009, 3:32 PM








Dear Leslie

1) I did not say that Krishnaraj was Shailesh's stooge, although 
self-admittedly the RTI he learned was from Shailesh Gandhi. What I was against 
was the emails being circulated between these people and Shaileshbhai over this 
incident.

2) Ultimately, what matters is one's intentions, till now I have not seen 
anything wrong with Krishnaraj's intentions. Very often people get misled but 
God has a way of bring wayward sheep back into the fold.

3) Unlike Shaieshbhai, Krishnaraj and the other 10 have no fear of going to 
jail. Shaileshbhai was a wimp who apologised to CJ Swatanter Kumar to avoid 
being jailed for contempt. If he was so sure of his principles (and facts) he 
should have held to his guns and dared the CJ to pass a reasoned order against 
him - in any case the maximum penalty for contempt is under a year whereas the 
Mumbai 11 are looking at 10 years at least. It was this streak of weakness - 
published in many Mumbai newspapers - which ultimately led to his becoming an 
IC - it should that he was weak and malleable (feet of clay).

4) Where is Shaileshbhai now? If I did not know better I would say that he is 
off availing the VIP air-conditioned hospitality of some Public Authority under 
him on a weekend (like some other ICs do)- but of course Mr Habibullah is an 
honest man and would not let "his flock" go so far astray.

Sarbajit

--- In rti_in...@yahoogrou ps.com, LESLIE ALMEIDA <lesals2000@ ...> wrote:
>
> 
> Dear Sarabjit
> 
> This article is a proof that The arrested activists are not Sailesh Gandhi's 
> stooges, at this stage of time they need love and understanding, they may 
> have overreacted, as they had got a copy of the landmark Judgement of the 
> Delhi High Court they went to the SIC office with the said Judgement,on 
> reading same SIC may have got worked up and also reacted,
> they did not mind going behing Bars,they did it for the sake of the silent 
> affected RTI applicant unlike Sailesh Gandhi when HC mumbai ordered his 
> arrest for speaking something in court (comptempt of court ) he immediately 
> apoligised 
> 
> L.Almeida
> 
> --- On Thu, 3/12/09, Krishnaraj Rao <thebravepedestrian @...> wrote:
> 
> > From: Krishnaraj Rao <thebravepedestrian @...>
> > Subject: My Shailesh Gandhi versus CIC Shailesh Gandhi
> > To: "krish" <sahasipadyatri@ ...>
> > Date: Thursday, March 12, 2009, 2:33 AM
> > Last Saturday, I
> > witnessed what is nowadays a rare sight: CIC Shailesh Gandhi
> > taking up cudgels against dishonesty. For a few moments, I
> > thought it was my Shailesh Gandhi.
> > 
> > Speaking at an Indian
> > Merchants’ Chamber (IMC) meeting on ‘Corporate
> > Governance’ in Mumbai, Shaileshbhai publicly named a dozen
> > fat-cats looting the public exchequer, including Tata
> > Finance, Mukesh Ambani, Shapoorji Pallonji, Shah Rukh Khan
> > and Simplex Mills. When his fellow-speakers tried to muddy
> > the waters with management jargon, Shaileshbhai wasted no
> > time with political correctness. “There is more dishonesty
> > in the corporate sector than our friends would have us
> > believe,� he said bluntly. (Download photo from this link: 
> > http://www.box. net/shared/ k70rry88bp
> > Â )
> > 

















      

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to