Hi Sarabjit,

Greatness in one self is that he makes a mistake and has the courage to
correct himself.

You have done the same and it is much appreciated.

Always remember that individuals do not matter. The cause of RTI is of prime
importance. Implementation of RTI should be in totality, nothing more and
nothing less. Any act to defeat RTI should be fought unitedly and
nationally.

As far as we 10 activist are concerned, we are committed to the cause of
RTI.

Regard - Mohammed Afzal

On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 11:16 PM, LESLIE ALMEIDA <[email protected]>wrote:

>
>
> Dear Sarabjit,
>
> it is the almightly God, that has gifted you with talent,  it is also
> prayers of people that
> have made you change your attitude, your were humble enough to apoligise.
> thats what humanity is all about, please not just one week but forever.
> with you at the helm RTI can go a long way
>
> Rgds
> L.Almeida
>
> --- On Sat, 5/30/09, Right Left <[email protected] <rleft53%40yahoo.com>>
> wrote:
>
> From: Right Left <[email protected] <rleft53%40yahoo.com>>
> Subject: Re: [rti_india] I resolve to be polite
>
> To: [email protected] <rti_india%40yahoogroups.com>
> Date: Saturday, May 30, 2009, 4:26 PM
>
> ____________ _________ _________ __
> From: sroy1947 <sroy1...@yahoo. com>
> To: rti_in...@yahoogrou ps.com
> Sent: Saturday, May 30, 2009 3:54:23 PM
> Subject: [rti_india] I resolve to be polite
>
> Dear Friends
>
> Very often (and increasingly so of late) I have been rude and arrogant on
> this group. I sincerely apologise to anyone whom I have offended.
>
> From now on (for at least 1 week) I shall try to be polite, respectful and
> helpful to everyone on this group. Its not very easy, because RTI is a war
> and our side is losing. Also, the pressures of moderating this group are
> tremendous and has been keeping me from my own active RTI'ing.
>
> Enjoy yourselves why I recharge my batteries.
>
> Sarbajit
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>  
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to