Exactly, Sir. Thank you. So are we meeting on 15th at 2:30 p.m.? Your
presence will be of great help.

 

Rakesh

 

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
Of sroy1947
Sent: 07 July 2009 11:02
To: [email protected]
Subject: [rti_india] Re: Hearing - Disclosure I.T. returnsof NGOs

If information "relating to" an NGO is held by a public authority WHICH THE
PIO INTENDS TO DISCLOSE IN RTI (there being no section 8 bar) a section 11
notice is issued to the NGO concerned to oppose disclosure.

On the other hand if the PIO ON HIS OWN feels that a section 8 exemption
applies to bar disclosure then where is the question of section 11 notice,
because the PIO alone must defend his denial. This is especially so in cases
where the Govt has granted financial concessions (like 80G) on the basis of
material available to it. It is crucial that any citizen of India be allowed
to examine the material (records) on the basis of which such administrative
concession was given ON DEMAND - the non-disclosure of which shall only
foster / perpetuate a regime of corruption.

Sarbajit

--- In [email protected] <mailto:rti_india%40yahoogroups.com> ,
"Rakesh Agarwal" <rak...@...> wrote:
>
> A hearing is scheduled for 15.07.09 at 2:30 before Information
Commissioner
> Sh. M.L. Sharma, Delhi. I request presence of those who may want to
present
> their views before the Commission.
> 
> Three hearings have been conducted into a matter involving disclosure of
> income tax returns and other documents that the NGOs submit with the
income
> tax authorities to claim exemption u/s 80G.
> 
> The public authority is seeking to deny information on the ground that it
is
> personal information whereas I am arguing that all NGOs, especially ones
> seeking exemption, grants and subsidies, claim to work for the welfare of
> public which is clearly a matter of public interest. NGOs cannot claim
> protection from disclosure of information which is held by the Government.
> 
> Regards
> 
> Rakesh Agarwal
> 
> Secretary, NyayaBhoomi





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to