Followup: In a recent DDA matter seeking property returns, IC(MLS) has also surveyed all the contradictory CIC orders and agreed with IC(ANT).
http://cic.gov.in/CIC-Orders/LS-10122008-06.pdf This is exactly why CIC is not a "court of record" - decisions having no precendentary value, and why "babus" are better at reading the RTI ACT than non-babus. PS: I come from a long line of Bengali Babus (some of them were from Calcutta). Sarbajit --- In [email protected], "sroy1947" <sroy1...@...> wrote: > > 1) You can always abandon RTI procedures in favour of normal CPC inspection / > copying procedures at fees prescribed under the UP High Court's Rules. > > 2) Re: your other email, applying for property returns of another govt > employee would certainly attract exemption 8(1)(j) and section 11. Although > there are conflicting decisions of CIC on "property tax" returns, you are > probably relying on those unreasoned one's based around IC(OPK)'s versions. > The leading order however is still IC(ANT)'s unchallenged > http://cic.gov.in/CIC-Orders/Decision_10072006_14.pdf > > Sarbajit > > --- In [email protected], vijay <vijaiksingh@> wrote: > > > > hello dear info warrior > > > > all courts of uttar pradesh charge rs 500 as initial fee and 15 rs per > > copy(photocopy charges) > > do some thing to remove this high fees of rti for single rti application. > > or suggest what can we do > > > > -- > > > > > > VIJAY KUMAR SINGH > > Asstt. Manager(IT) > > NHPC Ltd > > kishtwar > > J&K-182206 > > > > mobile 09906907950 > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > >
