Dear Shri Sarbarjit ji Judicial reforms are must, every one in India knows of corruption in Judiciary, their high headness. Judges must me made accountable. Whether Mr Bhushan is man of dubious cause has nothing to do with requirement of Public that Judges should be accountable.
S.K.Kapoor --- On Wed, 9/9/09, sroy1947 <[email protected]> wrote: From: sroy1947 <[email protected]> Subject: [rti_india] Re: RTI Application for information of ILLEGAL selection of supreme court judges. To: [email protected] Date: Wednesday, September 9, 2009, 11:37 AM Anyone with experience in/of Higher Judiciary in India knows that here is a clear case of pot calling kettle black. Who are these so-called Campaign for Judicial Accountability johnnies anyway. They are just fronts for other legal groups / political / mafias. I can give you a long list of Mr Prashant Bhushan's own dubious causes represented. Let us be very clear - to be appointed to any high post in Govt today - whether as CJI or C'IC the first requirement is for the appointee to be pliable and corrupt. Knowing this to be fact, we accept it and work around it. Finally, please dont believe any or very thing you read in the media. The entire media is manipulated. Use your own powers of discrimination. Sarbajit --- In rti_in...@yahoogrou ps.com, suresh nangia <sknangia2004@ ...> wrote: > > Dear Shri Pradeep > > While I respect your right of opinion, I would request you to see the > Lead Story in India To-day of 7th September: Judiciary under scrutiny / > Lords on Trial. It contains comments of number of past Chief Justices > of Supreme Court as also other legal luminiaries. It may perhaps make you to > rethink ab;out the opinion you are holding > > S K NANGIA > 093222 58038 022 28677258 > > --- On Fri, 4/9/09, pradeep kp <advpradeep@ ...> wrote: > > From: pradeep kp <advpradeep@ ...> > Subject: Re: [rti_india] RTI Application for information of ILLEGAL selection > of supreme court judges. > To: rti_in...@yahoogrou ps.com, india...@yahoogroup s.com > Cc: "'Hon'ble Chief Justice of India Mr K G Balakrishanan' " <supremecourt@ > ...>, "'Sukant Bhattacharya' " <sbjbp2...@. ..>, supremecourt@ ... > Date: Friday, 4 September, 2009, 11:31 AM > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Members > > > > I have gone through the subject matter of the RTI Application filed by Mr. > Gurmeet Singh. I must say this is the best example for misuse of RTI. We > all know Supreme Court being the Highest Court in the Country we should > honour its Judgments on Judges appointment. As per the provisions of the > Constitution, of course the Parliament is the law making body. We should > remember, our constitutional makers equally identified the importance of > Supreme Court in law making process as Article 141 mandates honouring of law > declared by the Court. > > > > We have judgments on power of SC to appointment of Judges. Lastly in the > presidential reference case, the SC declared the law and that become final. > For keeping the independence of judiciary as a reality, no one will support > appointment of judges by a political body under the pressure of political > groups, as done in earlier. > > > > I have a strong feeling that we should condemn the RTI application filed by > Mr. Gurmeet Singh, as it is unnecessary and misuse of his right under RTI. > > > > PRADEEP K.P. > > Advocate & Government Pleader (Taxes) > > O/o the Advocate General, Kerala > > High Court of Kerala- Ernakulam > > 09446462003 - 09446402003 > > advpradeepkp@ gmail.com > > advprad...@yahoo. com > > > > --- On Thu, 9/3/09, Bhushan Kumar <b4bhus...@gmail. com> wrote: > > > > From: Bhushan Kumar <b4bhus...@gmail. com> > > Subject: [rti_india] RTI Application for information of ILLEGAL selection of > supreme court judges. > > To: rti_in...@yahoogrou ps.com, india...@yahoogroup s.com > > Cc: "'Hon'ble Chief Justice of India Mr K G Balakrishanan' " <supremecourt@ > nic.in>, "'Sukant Bhattacharya' " <sbjbp2...@yahoo. com>, supremecourt@ > hub.nic.in > > Date: Thursday, September 3, 2009, 10:33 PM > > > > > > > > RTI MATTER/ Most Urgent > > > > September 2, 2009 > > > > To > > > > The Public Information Officer, > > > > O/o the President of India, > > > > New Delhi > > > > Subject: Request for information within 48 hours as per section 7 (1) of > > the RTI Act. > > > > References: > > > > 1. 34th report on the High Court and Supreme Court Judges (salaries and > > Conditions of Service) amendment bill, 2008 prepared by the parliament > > committee headed by Dr. E.M. S. Natchiappan, Rajya Sabha M.P. and > > subsequently passed by Parliament of India. > > 2. Five new vacancies of Supreme Court judges created recently. > > 3. Selection of five Supreme Court judges through collegium based > > system. > > > > Dear Sir, > > > > It has been in newspapers that SC panel is proceeding with the collegium > > based selection process for filling the newly created five positions. > > Whereas, the parliament committee headed by Dr. E.M. Sudarsana Natchiappan, > > Rajya Sabha M.P., recommended 'scrapping of the present procedure for > > appointment of judges' and the same was subsequently approved by Parliament > > of India on 18th February 2009. So, it appears that CJI is not honoring the > > recommendations approved by parliament regarding the selection of the Judges > > earlier this year. > > > > Please provide the complete information (scope and definition of > > 'information' is same as given in RTI act 2005) in respect of the following; > > > > 1. Information pertaining to the on-going collegium based selection of > > five new Supreme Court Judges > > 2. Information pertaining to the reason as why Chief Justice of India > > is not honoring / adhering to the recommendations passed by Parliament. > > 3. Information pertaining to the hasty action in the selecting the > > judges prior to appointment of Judicial Commission as per the recommendation > > passed by Parliament. > > 4. Copies of the letters or petitions or any submissions received for > > stopping the Chief Justice headed collegiums from making the selection of > > supreme court judges. > > 5. Information pertaining to appointment of Judicial Commission as > > parliament's recommendations. > > > > Please supply this information with 48 hours because wrong selection of > > Judge poses a threat to life and Liberty. So, this information would require > > response as per section 7(1) of RTI act. > > > > Please supply the requested information in CD diskette as per the RTI act. > > The requisite fee of 10/- is attached in the shape of IPO with this > > application. > > > > I will be very thankful to you. > > > > Yours Truly, > > > > Gurmeet Singh > > > > #14/6, Third floor, > > > > West Patel Nagar, > > > > New Delhi - 08 > > > > 011-25883286 > > > > PS: IPO of Rs.10/- towards application fee will follow through post. > > > > _____ > > > > See the Web's breaking stories, chosen by people like you. Check out Yahoo! > > Buzz <http://in.rd. yahoo.com/ tagline_buzz_ 1/*http:/ in.buzz.yahoo. com/> . > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > See the Web's breaking stories, chosen by people like you. Check > out Yahoo! Buzz. http://in.buzz. yahoo.com/ > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
