http://lobis.nic.in/dhc/SKN/judgement/19-09-2009/SKN15092009CW83632008.pdf
"2. The impugned order dated 7th November, 2008 suffers from two infirmities. Firstly, it is a non-speaking order and secondly the impugned order was passed without notice to the third parties, i.e. the petitioner and Ms. Sangeeta Paul, Principal of the petitioner school about whom certain information was sought by the respondent No. 4. On these two grounds, the impugned order cannot be sustained and has to be set aside." "6 ... The appeal filed before the Information Commissioner has been allowed by order dated 7th November, 2008. As noted above, the Information Commissioner has allowed the appeal without giving any reasons and has merely stated that the exemption claimed under Section 8(1)(j) is only a ploy to deny the information. This does not meet the requirement of the Section, the Act and principle of administrative law, i.e., giving of reasons."
