Mr Sarbajit, Sec 24 ONLY ALLOWS that information that is related to Human Rights or Corruption issues. Nowhere does it say that all issue not pertaining to security or national interests can be disclosed by these organisations.
This Dharmendra is going a bit too far. RTIwanted --- On Sun, 7/4/10, sarbajit roy <[email protected]> wrote: From: sarbajit roy <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [rti_india] Re: What does the bbest voted IC means by this ? To: [email protected] Date: Sunday, July 4, 2010, 5:06 PM Another thing If we compare the approach of our "best" IC with that of Habibullah and SN Mishra on the identical question of DRDO We find that Mr H has wrung his hands like Pontius Pilate, and Mishra has taken the babu's way out by saying "not possible under Rules saar". http://cic.gov. in/CIC-Orders/ WB-27032009- 03.pdf http://cic.gov. in/CIC-Orders/ SM-09072009- 09.pdf but our group hero has bashed down all the doors like Dharmendra in his prime and is waiting for some 'mard ka baccha' to challenge him. On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 10:26 PM, sarbajitr <sroy1...@yahoo. com> wrote: The answers lie here http://cic.gov. in/CIC-Orders/ LS-17022010- 04.pdf http://www.rti. india.gov. in/cic_decisions /CIC_LS_A_ 2010_000107. pdf http://cic.gov. in/CIC-Orders/ LS-08102009- 05.pdf http://cic.gov. in/CIC-Orders/ LS-29012010- 06.pdf http://cic.gov. in/CIC-Orders/ LS-02032010- 07.pdf http://cic.gov. in/CIC-Orders/ LS-16102009- 04.pdf The real point you are missing in all these decisions is "THIS Commission in a series of decisions has held ..." One thing you can be sure about is that IC(MLS) is very well prepared if the DRDO takes him to Court. Sarbajit
