Dear Jam If anyone is "dumb" it is the person who posted this message,
The CPIO's reply to query 1 was precise, as was the AA's. Ms Singh in her capacity as second appellate has delivered an unexceptionable decision upholding the department's view (and highlighting the importance of precise.drafting by RTI applicants). Ashish == In [email protected] <rtiwant...@..> wrote == http://www.rti.india.gov.in/cic_decisions/CIC_SS_A_2009_000083_M_37650.pdf Applicant asked for various information from BIS and the first one was: * Qus.1. Please send me your office newly published manual (17 points manual of booklet) belonging to the year 2008-09, according under section 4(1)(b) of the Right to Information Act. 2005.* To this, the PIO replied: * Ans. Your Query is not clear.* *The First Appellate Authority (FAA)/Dy. Director General (South), Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) vide his order dated 16.10.2009 upheld the reply / decision of the CPIO.* And our IC SS in the CIC ruled: *During the hearing the Respondent submit, in respect to point no. 1 of the RTI Application, that the Applicant has not mentioned the specific manual / booklet he is referring to in his application. The BIS is using various manuals for the activities being carried out and the manuals are already placed in Public Domain. The Commission holds that since the Appellant not mentioned the specific information he has sought, the Respondent have not been able to furnish the requisite documents to him.* ========= Any more vacancies available in the World Bank please ? RTIwanted
