Mr Ashish,

A majority of the RTI applicants in this country are not bureaucrats trained in 
precise drafting or from Oxbridge. Show it to your next door (hopefully non 
babu) neighbor. Even he/she will understand what the applicant has asked for.

Maybe you might like to send the applicant to the World Bank too !

PS: BTW, you might like to train some of the ICs in the CIC in precise drafting 
of their orders too.

RTIwanted

--- On Sun, 7/18/10, ashish kr1965 <[email protected]> wrote:

From: ashish kr1965 <[email protected]>
Subject: [rti_india] Re: What have we done to deserve such dumb ICs in the CIC ?
To: [email protected]
Date: Sunday, July 18, 2010, 3:46 PM







 



  


    
      
      
      Dear Jam

If anyone is "dumb" it is the person who posted this message,

The CPIO's reply to query 1 was precise, as was the AA's.
Ms Singh in her capacity as second appellate has delivered an

unexceptionable decision upholding the department's view
(and highlighting the importance of precise.drafting by 
RTI applicants).

Ashish

== In rti_in...@yahoogrou ps.com <rtiwant...@. .> wrote ==

http://www.rti. india.gov. in/cic_decisions /CIC_SS_A_ 2009_000083_ M_37650.pdf

Applicant asked for various information from BIS and the first one was:




Qus.1. Please send me your office newly published manual (17 points
manual of booklet) belonging to the year 2008-09, according under
section 4(1)(b) of the Right to Information Act. 2005.
 

To this, the PIO replied:
 

Ans. Your Query is not clear.
 
 The First Appellate Authority (FAA)/Dy. Director General (South), Bureau of 
Indian

Standards (BIS) vide his order dated 16.10.2009 upheld the reply / decision of 
the CPIO.
 

And our IC SS in the CIC 
ruled:
 
 During the hearing the Respondent submit, in respect
to point no. 1 of the RTI

Application, that the Applicant has not mentioned the specific manual / booklet 
he is

referring to in his application. The BIS is using various manuals for the 
activities being

carried out and the manuals are already placed in Public Domain. The Commission

holds that since the Appellant not mentioned the specific information he
has sought, the

Respondent have not been able to furnish the requisite documents to him.

=========

Any more vacancies available in the World Bank please ?

RTIwanted



    
     

    
    


 



  






      

Reply via email to