Hello, thanks for the link to the paper but I dont have access to it. Aside from how the trajectory is interpreted within in RTK. My actual question was
if any of those two trajectories would need another reconstruction filter than the FDK Filter. From my point of understanding a specific rotation around the object is necessary for fbp/fdk (like c-arm bow, standard circular cone-beam trajectory). That’s why I asked If the first trajectory needs some other reconstruction filter because the object itself doesn’t rotate around itself. It actually gets translated on a circular path. So I was more expecting a “yes” or “no” to the fdk filter or a hint to another filter (except iterative reconstructions) I should use for these trajectories. To trajectory 2: I think the projections are different. The object rotates and each projection shows a different view. Kind regards, Robert C. Von: simon....@gmail.com [mailto:simon....@gmail.com] Im Auftrag von Simon Rit Gesendet: Dienstag, 10. Oktober 2017 20:29 An: Robert Calliess Cc: Cyril Mory; rtk-users@public.kitware.com Betreff: Re: [Rtk-users] FDK for planar ct Hi, Let me try to clarify what I mean by "source trajectory wrt the object." In tomography, you need to determine the source trajectory in the object coordinate system, we don't really care about the source trajectory in the room coordinate system. For example, rotating the source on a circular trajectory or rotating the object makes no difference for the reconstruction algorithm. That's why we call diagnostic scanners "helical scanners". So for trajectory 1, it seems that the source trajectory (again, wrt to the object) is a circle but the object is offset. This is somewhat similar to https://doi.org/10.1109/TNS.2006.880977 except that the detector is not tilted so FDK would be the only FBP algorithm I could think of. But the situation is really not good, data are missing and iterative reconstruction should give better results. Trajectory 2: what I said in my previous email is true, it's useless I believe, all projections are similar up to a 2D transform of the projection. Simon On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 8:07 PM, Robert Calliess <robert.calli...@gmx.de> wrote: Hello, I try to clarify the both trajectories. Trajectory 1: No, i dont move the source on two circles. The xray source is fixed. Only the object and the detector moves. Both move on a circular path so that the iso-ray always passes through the pcb centre and the detector centre. There is one orthogonal view and the others are the ones moving on the circular path. (Object is not rotating around its own axis). Trajectory 2: Yes, the xray source lies in the rotation axis and only the object rotates around its z-axis. Detector and xray source are fixed and the detector is tilted. It’s almost like this trajectory here https://www.ikeda-shoponline.com/engctsoft/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Oblique-View-CT1.jpg except that the xray source lies on the rotation axis. I hope this helps to understand the trajectories I have to deal with. Kind regards, Robert Von: simon....@gmail.com [mailto:simon....@gmail.com] Im Auftrag von Simon Rit Gesendet: Dienstag, 10. Oktober 2017 19:06 An: Robert Calließ Cc: Cyril Mory; rtk-users@public.kitware.com Betreff: Re: [Rtk-users] FDK for planar ct Hi, It's still not clear to me but what is helpful is to think in terms of source trajectory wrt the object. Trajectory 1: if I understand, you move the source on two circles plus one point. I don't know of a FBP algorithm to reconstruct this, but there might be one. I would consider iterative reconstruction first. Trajectory 2: your trajectory is a point, the source does not move with respect ot the object since it lies on the rotation axis. So each projection contains exactly the same information up to a simple 2D projection deformation. So it's hopeless to reconstruct from one projection only. To create the correct geometry, I would suggest using the function AddProjection <https://github.com/SimonRit/RTK/blob/master/code/rtkThreeDCircularProjectionGeometry.h#L92> for which you provide the source and detector positions plus the 3D coordinates of the two axes of the coordinate system of the projection. I hope this helps Simon On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 5:43 PM, "Robert Calließ" <robert.calli...@gmx.de> wrote: Hello, thank you for the fast reply. To answer your questions first. In this case the abbrevation pcb stands for printed circuit board. Next point is the trajectory we are currently handling with. Please see the attached image "trajectory.png". There are two schematics showing the side view and top view for trajectory type 1 and a side-view for trajectory type 2. For type 1: The xray source is fixed. The pcb is clamped within a transport, so the pcb and the detector are moveable with in the xy plane. As you can see at the image, the pcb moves along a circular path but the pcb itself is not rotating. And let's assume that the iso ray always passes through the centre of the pcb and the centre of the detector. For type 2: The xray source is fixed and the detector is tilted. The pcb lies centred in the middle of a table. So that the pcb rotates around its centre around the z-axis. I hope this makes clear what trajectory i'm dealing with. Thank you. Kind regards, Robert C. Gesendet: Dienstag, 10. Oktober 2017 um 15:31 Uhr Von: "Cyril Mory" <cyril.m...@creatis.insa-lyon.fr> An: "Robert Calliess" <robert.calli...@gmx.de>, rtk-users@public.kitware.com Betreff: Re: [Rtk-users] FDK for planar ct Dear Robert, Your description of the trajectory is very obscure to me. Maybe you have a very unusual X-ray system. Could you make the following points clear : - what is a PCB ? - what is fixed/moving in your system (we need this information for the object, the source and the detector), and what kind of trajectories have the moving parts ? - can you re-draw your sketch with just 2 or 3 positions (ideally, on similar but separate drawings), each one with the object, the source and the detector ? If you do that, we should have a clear understanding of how your acquisition goes, and be able to give you appropriate advice. Best regards, Cyril On 10/10/2017 15:02, Robert Calliess wrote: Hello rtk users, I have question to the RTK FDK Filter. As far as I understand from to the fourier slice theorem the object to be reconstructed needs a circular trajectory and needs to rotate its own centre. Please have a look at the attached sketch. With this planar trajectory (Object, a PCB, is moved on a circle trajectpry “in-plane”, PCB itself is not rotating) do I need a special filtering if I want to use FDK for planar CT with respect to the sketched trajectory ? I tried a circular in-plane trajectory where the PCB is centred and rotates around its centre point. And with 100 projections I get good results. But with the trajectory I described (sketch, attached image) the results are not so good. Because of the row-wise ramp filter It looks like there is a directional dependency. My assumption is, and with respect to fourier slice theorem, that the missing object rotation (rotation around itself) causes there directional effects. So my questions to the experts are. Do I need to apply a special filtering before backprojecting with FDK or is it just the wrong algorithm for this kind of trajectory ? kind regards, Robert C. _______________________________________________ Rtk-users mailing list Rtk-users@public.kitware.com http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/rtk-users _______________________________________________ Rtk-users mailing list Rtk-users@public.kitware.com http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/rtk-users
_______________________________________________ Rtk-users mailing list Rtk-users@public.kitware.com http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/rtk-users
