Hi,

I'm reconstructing a homogeneous cylinder. My problem is that I have better 
results for 180 projections, than for 360 for SART (with default parameters), 
and the same geometry (except the number of projections).

I don't understand why adding projections adds more errors, since it should be 
better (and for other algorithms this is indeed better with 360 projections).

With 180 projections, the mean error on the cylinder is 1,6% , and the maximal 
error is 21,6%. While, with 360 projections, on the cylinder the mean error is 
6,4%, and the maximal error is 169%.
Even if I don't take into account voxels close to edges, there are more errors 
with 360 projections.

Is there a reason why I obtain worse results with 360 projections?

Since my files are too big, I added them here 
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1AYumjqNGUr8DZ0kxIbF7Ab1xet7srk-z?usp=sharing.
 I also added a file with the commands I used.


Thank you very much.

Anaïs
_______________________________________________
Rtk-users mailing list
Rtk-users@public.kitware.com
https://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/rtk-users

Reply via email to