> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ian Kluft)
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Raymond Y. Lillard)
> > Of the two options presented here, I think this one, option 1, is the
> > most useful, long term. It could be beneficailly fed back to the RH
> > people from them to present as one of their "rough cuts". I think they
> > would be pleased to have it.
>
> When considering contributing RTL back into the base, don't forget that
> Red Hat is one among several Linux distributions. While I wouldn't
> discourage working with the distribution providers to promote RTL,
> most plans for contributions should be aimed at the Linux development
> kernels.
>
> The Linux 2.2 kernel is likely to be released by next month so it's too
> late to get in there. So maybe everyone should be shooting to have RTL
> included in the 2.3.X development kernels. That could be just 6 weeks'
> from now...
Good point.
Although I have been using Linux for many years, I haven't followed the
kernel development very closely because I haven't needed to do anything
to the kernel itself. RT-Linux changes that.
Question:
Is there a site where I can get the history of development (features) of
the kernel? I went to linux.org but their site is so slow I gave up in
fustration. I am actively considering RT-Linux for a significant control
project and need to pick a kernel. My concerns are, stability, un-needed
features which may impact my RT modifications, maintenance and obsolence.
By obsolence, I mean that I don't want to pick a kernel that is unlikely
to run on mother-boards which will be available in 5 years.
--
Regards,
Ray
--- [rtl] ---
To unsubscribe:
echo "unsubscribe rtl" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] OR
echo "unsubscribe rtl <Your_email>" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
----
For more information on Real-Time Linux see:
http://www.rtlinux.org/~rtlinux/
