We noticed the same phenomena in the 2.0.x series. Is the fix going to be
applied there? or is it just for the 2.2.x stuff?
At 08:06 PM 10/12/99 -0500, you wrote:
>Yea I think some of the thread missed the list because I wasn't paying
>atttention to who my mailer was replying to
>My original description went to the list on oct 6, so you I won't repeat it
>here but under sufficient load
>for FI in `find /usr/ -type f`; do
> cat $FI >/dev/null
>done
>my user task was freezing up on a fifo read, usually in under a half hour.
>Micheal Barabanov looked at it and sent a new version of rtl_fifo.c which
looks
>like it fixed it. I suspect there will be a beta 17 shortly, otherwise I can
>forward his message.
>
>On Tue, 12 Oct 1999, Guilherme Nelson F De Souza wrote:
>> Sorry, but I think I missed this thread. What is wrong with
>> rtl_fifo? I have Beta16 and it seems to be working fine (or
>> isn't it?) ;-)
>>
>> Guilherme
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -------------< G. N. DeSouza >-------------
>> ---------< [EMAIL PROTECTED]>---------
>> --< http://rvl1.ecn.purdue.edu/~gnelson >--
>--- [rtl] ---
>To unsubscribe:
>echo "unsubscribe rtl" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] OR
>echo "unsubscribe rtl <Your_email>" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>----
>For more information on Real-Time Linux see:
>http://www.rtlinux.org/~rtlinux/
>
>
--- [rtl] ---
To unsubscribe:
echo "unsubscribe rtl" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] OR
echo "unsubscribe rtl <Your_email>" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
----
For more information on Real-Time Linux see:
http://www.rtlinux.org/~rtlinux/
