Unfortunately, the version that Stuart sent today was not
up to date. However, the one I sent a few minutes before (or
after - depends on the mailserver) he did was more accurate
(I hope).
Please, let me know and I'll send it again (I can't do it
now).
Guilherme
>Date: Tue, 16 Nov 1999 14:47:22 -0700
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [rtl] RTL versus RTAI
>
>THANKS, Stuart and GN DeSouza for the table posted comparing RTL & RTAI in
>such a basic and cogent way! A first question about it:
> Under the column 486, RTL v2 with linux kernel 2.2.x reads "n" =>
>presumably meaning this does not run on 486's. But is that true? I've run
>miniRTL 2.0 derived directly from RTL 2.0, with kernel 2.2.13 on a Pentium I.
>
>Either way, this table would be great in THE RT MANUAL, with a change in
>header(s) so as to include 586es. I could help with the manual too, but
>again as noviate.
>
>Dr. S.C.
>
>
-------------< G. N. DeSouza >-------------
---------< [EMAIL PROTECTED]>---------
--< http://rvl1.ecn.purdue.edu/~gnelson >--
--- [rtl] ---
To unsubscribe:
echo "unsubscribe rtl" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] OR
echo "unsubscribe rtl <Your_email>" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
----
For more information on Real-Time Linux see:
http://www.rtlinux.org/~rtlinux/
