Paolo Mantegazza wrote:
> 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> > To be honest, I've never understand what Paolo means by the concept of a hardware 
>abstraction
> > layer beyond some renaming and use of indirect pointers to implement the 
>redirection.
> 
 > 
> The above is just the confession that in V3 you are now using the HAL
> concept, i.e. instead of patching the kernel use pointers.
> You are really a nice chap, when I proposed it you refused it, now, as
> usual, you are doing it and is OK, even dare to claim nothing changed.
 
Ok - big fun to read this.

However wouldn't be better to rather cooperate and get something
workable
into the Linux kernel.

Is there any chance that Real Time Linux will be a compilable option
of the standard Linux kernel in the near future??


-- 
             There are three types of people in the world:
               those who can count, and those who can't.
  Zdenek Kabelac  http://i.am/kabi/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] {debian.org; fi.muni.cz}

-- [rtl] ---
To unsubscribe:
echo "unsubscribe rtl" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] OR
echo "unsubscribe rtl <Your_email>" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
For more information on Real-Time Linux see:
http://www.rtlinux.org/rtlinux/

Reply via email to