Kai Moritz wrote: > Jan Kiszka schrieb: > >>> Looking in the netrpc.c and rtnet source I found, that there is a >>> name-mismatch. In rtnet the functions are called recvfrom_rt and so on. >>> (What version of rtnet are the rtai-guys using?!). >> >> >> >> This is a question someone of the RTAI community may answer best. I >> guess that the 3.2 branch is stuck to RTnet < 0.8 with respect to netrpc. >> > You're right! I posted the question on the rtai-users mailinglist > > >> Did you already try the magma CVS? There is hope that the included >> netrpc version is more compatible with recent RTnet. Note that RTnet SVN >> head does not yet work with any RTAI version due to incomplete RTDM >> support of that variant - work in progress according to the maintainers. >> > I will give it a try. > But perhaps, you could also tell me, which version of rtnet will work > with rtai 3.2 or 3.1 ! >
Except for the netrpc stuff, RTnet 0.8.3 /should/ generally run fine with 3.2 and 3.1. But I think to remember some issues in older RTAI LXRT schedulers (at least in release 3.2), so try the ksched as well when you notice problems during startup or cleanup (the kernel scheduler never caused troubles). Jan
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
