M. Koehrer wrote: > Hi Jan, > > o.k. I have implemented a counter that is incremented by the number of > packets at the end > of speedo_interrupt (before the call to rt_mark_stack_mgr). > In my kernel module I have implemented at counter as well that is incremented > whenever I > do a successful read of a message. > As the driver is used for some initialization stuff which is not related to > the kernel module, the > values are not equal. However, the difference between both values keeps > constant over the time. > Even at the situation that I get a timeout that should not happen, the > difference is the same. > That indicates to me, that - for what ever reason - the driver does not > detect a received packet or > does not place this packet in the receive queue. > After recovering from the timeout by sending a dummy message to my embedded > device, it continues > normally, the difference of the counters stays the same.
Hmm, looks like you hit this nice "feature" of the PRO/100: http://www.rts.uni-hannover.de/rtnet/lxr/source/drivers/rt_eepro100.c#L1206 What does your rx_bug indicate? Jan
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________ RTnet-users mailing list RTnet-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rtnet-users
