To Yap Tse [EIE] wrote:
> Jan,
> 
> do you mean that even the rtping resolution is nanosecond, but the
> hardware/software limits the accuracy to micosecond?
> 
> Can I use the TSC as the time source instead of somthing likes 8254.

The problem is not the clock source (which is normally TSC anyway), but
predominantly the jitter of any interrupt-driven event (like "some
packet just arrived") on both sides.

So, if you want to measure the end-to-end round-trip that is achievable
in software (e.g. with RTnet as-is), looking for nanoseconds is of
limited use. If there were some low-jitter black-box on the other side
whose responsiveness you want to analyse, then it would make sense to
look for better means to measure the /real/ (hardware) round-trip.

Jan

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
RTnet-users mailing list
RTnet-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rtnet-users

Reply via email to