Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote:
> A Dimarts 20 Març 2007 15:00, Jan Kiszka va escriure:
>> Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote:
>>> ...
>>> Ok,
>>>
>>> thanks for the answer. I have to addmitt that to me all the documentation
>>> is a bit confuse for someone that begins in this area. Although there are
>>> a lot documents, I'm a bit lost.
>> That's what we are gradually trying to improve via the wiki. Work in
>> progress, contributions of any form are welcome.
> 
> a Readme first ... 

What information are you missing in the existing top-level readme?

> 
>>> My configuration is a normal PIII 550 with a rtai + rtnet and two
>>> ethernet. One to our lab and another to a stäubli controller. Both have a
>>> 100Mb card and are connected with a cross cable.
>>>
>>> If I unload the rtnet and I load the normal driver and I do a simple ping
>>> of 200 bytes I obtain this values:
>>>
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ping -s 200 192.168.1.4
>>> PING 192.168.1.4 (192.168.1.4) 200(228) bytes of data.
>>> 208 bytes from 192.168.1.4: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.567 ms
>>> ....
>>> ....
>>> 208 bytes from 192.168.1.4: icmp_seq=48 ttl=64 time=0.523 ms
>>> ....
>>> 208 bytes from 192.168.1.4: icmp_seq=88 ttl=64 time=1.07 ms
>>> ......
>>> 208 bytes from 192.168.1.4: icmp_seq=101 ttl=64 time=0.529 ms
>>> ....
>>> 208 bytes from 192.168.1.4: icmp_seq=140 ttl=64 time=0.540 ms
>>> .....
>>>
>>> --- 192.168.1.4 ping statistics ---
>>> 158 packets transmitted, 158 received, 0% packet loss, time 157009ms
>>> rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.488/0.598/1.159/0.169 ms
>>>
>>> after ifdown, unload the module and loading the rtnet then:
>>>
>>> ulises:/usr/local/rtnet# sbin/rtping -s 200 192.168.1.4
>>> Real-time PING 192.168.1.4 200(228) bytes of data.
>>> .....
>>> 208 bytes from 192.168.1.4: icmp_seq=9 time=2547.4 us
>>> ....
>>> 208 bytes from 192.168.1.4: icmp_seq=24 time=3415.0 us
>>> ....
>>> 208 bytes from 192.168.1.4: icmp_seq=38 time=4722.8 us
>>> .....
>>> 208 bytes from 192.168.1.4: icmp_seq=45 time=5356.8 us
>>>
>>> --- 192.168.1.4 rtping statistics ---
>>> 45 packets transmitted, 45 received, 0% packet loss
>>> worst case rtt = 8016.3 us
>>>
>>>
>>> could someone explain me this, because I understand that us are micro
>>> second (10^-6) so, this is worst in rt than in a normal net.
>> If you picked the default setup via rtnet.conf, TDMA was activated at a
>> cycle period of 5 ms, one transmission slot per node and cycle. Thus you
>> get a latency of up to 2 x 5 ms.
>>
>> You can improve this by reducing the period or adding more transmission
>> slots per cycle. If you only want to use the RTnet link for RT traffic
>> and you have a collision-free media (cross-link or switched Ethernet),
>> you could also run RTnet without RTmac/TDMA. Writing a specialised RTmac
>> discipline (as a replacement for TDMA) is yet another option, but surely
>> a more complex one.
> 
> Ok, I only want a simple thing. The problem is that I need the fastest low 
> latency response as I can. I have only to send some bytes, no a lot of info.

Then you probably want plain RTnet without RTmac/TDMA.

> 
> You comment something about to modify the tdma.conf file. I have this 
> parameters:
> 
> master:
> ip 192.168.1.3
> cycle 5000
> slot 0 0
> slot 1 100
> 
> #slave:
 ^^^
This comments out the slave section mark, thus breaking the syntax.

> ip 192.168.1.3
> #mac 00:C0:3A:25:01:OB
> mac 00:A0:C9:1D:52:B9
> slot 0 2400
> slot 1 2200 2/2
> 
> but I don't know if this are correct or not.

The fragment above is for demonstration of the tdma.conf language. See
Documentation/README.rtmac for details about what those lines express.

> 
>> However, it all melts down to scheduling your network traffic for hard
>> real-time use, not to make it simply as fast as possible, but to make it
>> fully predictable.
> 
> Yes I know, but is a simple system: a PC with rtai and rtnet and a robot 
> controller with vxworks.

This doesn't tell anything about the communication structure, the timing
of your system, or the closure of the control loop (if there is any).

Jan

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
RTnet-users mailing list
RTnet-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rtnet-users

Reply via email to