Karl Reichert wrote:
>>> I'm sorry but I still don't get it. And sorry for the -20/-30 mistake.
>>>
>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I read the paper "RTnet -- A Flexible Hard Real-Time Networking
>>>>>> Framework" at
>>>> http://www.rts.uni-hannover.de/rtnet/download/RTnet-ETFA05.pdf and I
>>>>>> have a question concerning chapter 3.2, formula 3.
>>>>>>> T_slot = T_sched + t_slot - t_offset
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> As far as I understand this formula, the slaves calculate their own
>>>>>> starting point T_slot from T_sched (the planned transmission time of
>>>> master),
>>>>>> t_slot (slot duration?) and t_offset (offset between master and slave
>>>>>> clock). To my mind, this doesn't makes any sence. Maybe I
>> misunderstand
>>>> one of
>>>>>> the variables, but let me give a small example:
>>>>>>> T_sched = 15 (absolute time point)
>>>>>>> t_slot = 10 (duration)
>>>>>>> t_offset = 20
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Then, slave's starting point would be 15+10-20=5
>>>>>>> But how is it possible, if the master is the first one sending? I
>>>> don't
>>>>>> understand this formula.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Oops, you stumbled over an impreciseness of the variables in that
>>>> paper.
>>>>>> They must read T_sched,master and T_slot,slave, i.e. the first one is
>>>>>> related to the master view of time while the second one was
>> transformed
>>>>>> to the slave time base.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jan
>>>>>>
>>>>> But still, this doesn't makes sense to me. As I understand the paper,
>>>> formula 2 and 3 should fix potential scheduling jitters (the time
>> difference
>>>> between scheduled and "real" sending time on the master). But how can
>> this
>>>> be fixed, if the formula deals with the T_master_sched and not the
>>>> T_master_real (=T_master_xmit)?
>>>>> Let me give an example:
>>>>> at the same point of time (the moment the master sends sth), master
>>>> clock=10, slave clock=30
>>>>> the master jitter may be 2, which means that T_master_sched=10 and
>>>> T_master_xmit=12
>>>>> t_travel may be 3
>>>>> t_slot (Slot-Length) may be 5
>>>>>
>>>>> t_offset=12+3-35=-30
>>>> Hmm, my calculator prints "-20"... ;)
>>>>
>>> Okay, I agree, sorry for the mistake.
>>>
>>>>> T_slave_slot=10+5+30=45
>>>> And that would give 35 then, which is precisely the expected value (5
>> us
>>>> >from the scheduled cycle start 30 us in slave time). 8)
>>>>
>>> But if slave starts sending at 35 (which means 15 from master's point of
>> view) then it would send at the same time the master does. The slot is 5,
>> so if master would start exactly at 10, this would work. But because of the
>> jitter, it starts sending at 12, so if it uses his whole 5 ticks long
>> slot, it would end at 17 and this would clash with slave, which starts 
>> sending
>> already at 15.
>>
>> I think I see the misunderstanding: t_slot is not the slot size of the
>> master slot here. It is the slot _offset_ (relative to the cycle start)
>> of some arbitrary slave (or the master - then t_offset would just be 0).
>> That offset must account for a) the time the preceding slot requires at
>> least and b) the potential jitter of the preceding slot user.
> Okay, I think this misunderstanding seems to be in formula 2, not 3. You say, 
> the offset must account also the jitter. But to my mind it doesn't.
> Let's try an example with above numbers:
> a) not jitter occurs: t_offset = 10 + 3 - 33 = -20
> b) jitter is 2: t_offset = 12 + 3 - 35 = -20
> T_slave_recv changes from 33 to 35, because of master's jitter of 2 the data 
> arrives 2 ticks later at slave.
> So, as a result, the offset does not take any jitter into account.

Which is precisely the intention: Make the clock offset estimation
_independent_ of the synchronisation signal sender jittery. Now you can
use the _scheduled_ cycle beginning (based on the master clock) which
comes along with the sync frame to calculate the _scheduled_ slot
beginning of some slave (based on the respective local slave clock).

Jan

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
RTnet-users mailing list
RTnet-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rtnet-users

Reply via email to