Karl Reichert wrote: >>> But how is this jittering handled than? To my mind, if the master >> jitters, i.e. putting his data later on the wire than planned, than all >> following >> also have to put their data later on the wire, otherwise we get a >> collision. Or is therefore the TDMA_OFFSET (from rtnet.conf) defined, which >> would >> leave enough space that jitter doesn't causes any damage? >> >> Precisely the latter. >> >> The point is that it wouldn't make much sense to take care of delayed >> master packets, you would have to do the same for slave packets. And >> that would mean to evaluate every frame on the wire in order to detect >> jitters of the preceding slot. Not efficient. >> >> Jan >> > Okay, then I know now what all this was about. I had all the time the idea > that formula 2 or 3 would calculate in some way the jitter of the master to > start the next slots later. Cause this is how I understood the paper. But now > I'm smarter ;)
Well, if that paper weren't published already, I would likely rethink that section now, maybe trying to make it more explicit. :) > > Thanks a lot Jan! > Karl You are welcome! Jan PS: Always take care of CCs on reply... :)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________ RTnet-users mailing list RTnet-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rtnet-users
