Dear Jan,

Yes, I modfiy the original at91_ether from vanilla kernel and putting the
requirements for RTnet based on rtnet/Document, stripping off quite a number
of features in the original source and built it as a kernel module. It is
mess and I need to modify before posting. Which one you prefer, incorporate
inside rtnet-0.9.9 or using SVN?

By the way, there is no way to skip the TDMA mechanism if I would like use
the Linux networking stack?

Please advice. Thanks

Regards,
Chun Yeow

On 8/24/07, Jan Kiszka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Yeoh Chun Yeow wrote:
> > Dear Jan Kiszka,
> >
> > - Do you plan to post your changes? Would be great.
> > No problem, I can post my change. But how could I do that?
>
> The core of your changes is likely the new driver source file, isn't it?
> You may start with posting that one. If you have changes against vanilla
> RTnet to make the driver build inside the tree, run diff -up against an
> unmodified tree. Or are you developing against some SVN checkout? Then
> check what also applies to Xenomai:
> http://www.xenomai.org/index.php/Contributing_Patches
>
> >
> > - Are these numbers over plain RTnet or with RTmac/TDMA active?
> > This is plain RTnet and I configure this manually. Is that necessary for
> > TDMA activation before we can use the TCP/IP tunneling for Linux?
>
> The VNICs are provided with RTmac + some discipline like TDMA to tunnel
> non-RT packets through a dedicated RT network. Please have a look at the
> documentation on www.rtnet.org and under rtnet/Documentation in your
> local tree.
>
> Jan
>
>
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >>  http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
RTnet-users mailing list
RTnet-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rtnet-users

Reply via email to