Yeoh Chun Yeow wrote: > Dear Jan, > > Yes, I modfiy the original at91_ether from vanilla kernel and putting the > requirements for RTnet based on rtnet/Document, stripping off quite a number > of features in the original source and built it as a kernel module. It is > mess and I need to modify before posting. Which one you prefer, incorporate > inside rtnet-0.9.9 or using SVN?
SVN is always preferred. > > By the way, there is no way to skip the TDMA mechanism if I would like use > the Linux networking stack? TDMA and RTmac can be left alone, like you already did. "Using the Linux networking stack", that is the point here. I still have a vague feeling that you are trying to use RTnet for some purpose it wasn't designed for (did you read my very first remarks regarding this?). What is your application scenario, and how shall RTnet help? Jan
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________ RTnet-users mailing list RTnet-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rtnet-users
