Theodore P. Huntington wrote:
> On 9/6/2007 8:52 AM, Karl Reichert wrote:
> >   Theodore P. Huntington wrote:
>     
> > >     Has anybody successfully created an embedded rtnet app (rtnet on a
> > > 
> computer communicating in real-time with a MAC/PHY chip on a PCB)? Do 
> > > 
> you think it would be very complex to use a PCB with MAC/PHY to 
> > > 
> communicate in real-time with a computer running rtnet?
> 
> thanks
> Ted
>    
> > >    
> >   
> Yes I do. I implemented a basic RTnet (only slave functionality) on an 
> > Infineon TriCore 1130 and a RTapp on top, both running fine. But I don't
> > know if this is what you mean?
> 
> Karl
>   

> Thanks, that is interesting to read about the 1130. How fast is your rt(at
> 100Mb=10ns)? Is programming the 1130 expensive and difficult? I seethat 
> this device has an onboard 100Mb full duplex MAC. I have a robotwith many 
> motors and input sensors, and so I am comparing USB,Firewire, and ethernet
> in terms of how fast I can move data from acomputer to and from these many
> many external devices.
> 
> thanks again,
> Ted
> 


In my specific tested case, I sent messages of 100 byte length with 1 master pc 
(reference rtnet 0.9.9) to 2 slaves (both TriCore 1130 with my own 
implementation). I can communicate with a cycle length of 200 microseconds or 
more without problems, which means that in each cycle all three are sending a 
message and no collisions occur.

Karl
-- 
von Karl Reichert

Psssst! Schon vom neuen GMX MultiMessenger gehört?
Der kanns mit allen: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/multimessenger

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >>  http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
RTnet-users mailing list
RTnet-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rtnet-users

Reply via email to