Yeoh Chun Yeow wrote:
> Dear Jan,
> 
> Attach the patch on AT91 ethernet driver. Have a look.

Great, thanks. You build this out of the RTnet tree, right? Would be
nice to see it inside drivers/, and to have the required changes to the
build system done as well - when time permits. Then generate a true
patch from your changes (just like here [1]) and repost.

> 
> At the line 118 in the tdma_worker.c file that you mentioned, I observed in
> the trunk the function call is rtdm_task_sleep_abs but however in my
> rtnet-0.9.9 version, it is rtdm_task_sleep_until. Any different on this?

Nope, they are expected to do the same, the latter is just an old version.

> 
> I try to put the printk statement after the rtdm_task_sleep_until but I
> couldn't see any related kernel messages. Is this the problem? I also put
> the printk statement at beginning of do_request_cal_job but also see no
> kernel log message on this. Is this because this function is not called at
> all?

The former is expected, the latter is weird. Please have a look at
tdma_worker(), try to understand the event flow, specifically after a
Sync frame arrival was signalled, and dig deeper what happens there in
your case on your own.

Thanks,
Jan

[1] http://www.xenomai.org/index.php/Xenomai:Contributing_Patches

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >>  http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
RTnet-users mailing list
RTnet-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rtnet-users

Reply via email to