On Thu, August 16, 2007 10:38, Jan Kiszka wrote:

>>>> I'm using two machines here, one acts as a master, other one acts as
>>>> a slave. The slave isn't able to synchronize with master when
>>>> configuring a cycle length around 10 down to 2 ms (and most probably
>>>> any cycle length lower then that). When choosing 1 second cycle
>>>> length, it syncs fine.
>>>> Capturing the whole story with wireshark shows, that slave in short
>>>> cycle configurations requests reply calibration frame e.g. in cycle
>>>> 1500, although it sends request calibration frame in cycle 1700, so
>>>> of course this can't work. As it works in 1 s cycle configuration,
>>>> only reason for this behavoir I can imagine is, that slave isn't able
>>>> to calculate and send request calibration frame early enough. But
>>>> this isn't really possible, because we're talking about a >2GHz
>>>> machine (x86).
>>> ...which is know to be free of hardware-related latency quirks (tested
>>> with Xenomai tools)? If yes, please send be your trace.
>> Don't wonder I'm answering :-)
>> attached a complete log of xeno-test, do you also need a wireshark log ?
> Yeah, I was actually referring to the pcap file.
> Anyway, the xeno-test looks a fishy as well. The latency tool appears to
> run fine (except for the testing device conflicts, but that's a
> different story), but the cyclictest is totally screwed! And these are
> dimensions normally related to SMI etc. artefacts.
> Please make sure no other RT load is present during the test (just in
> case) and re-run latency and cyclictest stand-alone for several minutes
> each. If strange numbers remain (millisecond latencies...), check
> TROUBLESHOOTING hints and then report to xenomai-help.

Ok, warming it up, since it's not solved yet.
The Xenomai latencies seem to bee as they should (refer to Xenomai-help
list). We are still not able to synchronise a slave to a master.

The slave sends a synch. request and requests the answer in a slot, which
lies already in the past.

Greets, Nadym


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
RTnet-users mailing list
RTnet-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rtnet-users

Reply via email to