Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 5:06 PM, Wolfgang Grandegger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hi Gilles, >> >> >> >> Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: >> > On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 2:47 PM, Wolfgang Grandegger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >> >> With this patch non-real-time UDP packets a routed to the Linux >> >> network stack. You can enable this feature with the configure >> >> option "--enable-proxy-udp". >> > >> > I am interested by this patch since I use a similar feature. Is the >> > rtnet-proxy a per-interface thing, or is there only one rtnet-proxy >> > interface in the system ? >> >> As-is, one Linux network device named rtproxy will be created when >> loading rtnetproxy.ko. All in-coming non-real-time IP packets (TCP or >> UDP) from any RTnet interface will be forwarded to rtproxy. Out-going >> packets will be routed according to the RTnet routing table: >> >> http://www.rts.uni-hannover.de/rtnet/lxr/source/addons/rtnetproxy.c#211 >> >> If using the "[PATCH/RFC 2/5] RTnet-Proxy: ARP support", the rtproxy >> Linux device gets attached directly to the RTnet device specified via >> module parameter "rtdev_attach". >> >> Well, I'm just using one network device and did not think yet further. >> But it might make sense to have more than one rtproxy Linux network >> device and attach them to the corresponding RTnet device. >> >> What is your setup/requirement. > > I already have our setup of RTnet running, so I have no real > requirement. Ok, I know, I really should look for integration of the > modifications we have.
That would be nice, indeed. > Our setup is a gateway/router which does NAT via Linux for data > connections and acts as an IPBX (using Xenomai/Rtnet) for voice > connections. OK. > In our setup, we have one non real-time interface per real-time > interface (using the nomac vnics), and bridging and routing is set-up > using these non real-time interfaces. To support multiply rtproxy devices, rtnetproxy needs to be extended. But, as I see it, not much else is missing. > Also, in our setup, the ARP replies to requests sent by Linux are used > by RTnet before passing them to Linux, so that RTnet learns the MAC > addresses we no additional effort. As you already found out, "[PATCH/RFC 2/5] RTnet-Proxy: ARP support" adds that feature. Wolfgang. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ RTnet-users mailing list RTnet-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rtnet-users
