M. Koehrer wrote: > Hi all! > > I found in the net, that the standard linux driver e1000 will be splitted up > into > two drivers: e1000 and e1000e. > See e.g.: > http://linux.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/Kernel/2008-04/msg02026.html > > What about rtnet - do you think, we have to split up the rtnet r1000 drivers > as well? > In our application we have typically multiple e1000 boards (up to 6). > Some of the NICs are driven by the standard Linux driver, the others are used > with rtnet. > The cards= argument is out helper here... > When the standard linux/drivers ushave a different organization, this make > everything > much more complicated here... > > Any ideas, proposals, ... on this issue?
I haven't looked into the drivers, I just wonder if there might not be some common feature set and if we might not be lucky requiring only that for RTnet. Or what are differences feature-wise? Jan
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08
_______________________________________________ RTnet-users mailing list RTnet-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rtnet-users
