Susan wrote:
> Hi,
> I am confused by rt_dev_setsockopt().
> I modified simpleserver.c and simpleclient.c in 'rtnet-0.9.11/example/rtai'. 
> After adding ‘rt_dev_setsockopt’, programs went wrong and 'rt_dev_setsockopt' 
> returned '-92'.
> 
> I did below.
> "int optval=1;
> test=setsockopt(SockFd, SOL_SOCKET, SO_REUSEADDR, (const void*)&optval, 
> sizeof 

SO_REUSEADDR is not supported by RTnet. Do you actually need multiple
binds on the same port?

> (optval));
> printf("test=%d\n",test);// test=-92 " 
> 
> I use linux-2.6.23,rtai-3.7 and rtnet-0.9.11.
> 
> Thanks for your support. 
> 
> Susan
> 

Jan

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community
Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support
A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy
Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers
http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev 
_______________________________________________
RTnet-users mailing list
RTnet-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rtnet-users

Reply via email to