A Dimarts, 12 de novembre de 2013, Jan Kiszka va escriure: > On 2013-11-12 08:58, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote: > > Hi, > > > > using the latest version of xenomai (2.6.3) and rtnet git master, the driver > > experimental/e1000 doesn't compile: > > > > > > /home/leopold.palomo/rtnet-code- > > git/drivers/experimental/e1000/e1000_main.c:271:23: error: expected ‘=’, ‘,’, > > ‘;’, ‘asm’ or ‘__attribute__’ before ‘e1000_remove’ > > /home/leopold.palomo/rtnet-code- > > git/drivers/experimental/e1000/e1000_main.c:403:2: error: implicit declaration > > of function ‘__devexit_p’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > > /home/leopold.palomo/rtnet-code- > > git/drivers/experimental/e1000/e1000_main.c:403:26: error: ‘e1000_remove’ > > undeclared here (not in a function) > > /home/leopold.palomo/rtnet-code- > > git/drivers/experimental/e1000/e1000_main.c:1083:22: error: expected ‘=’, ‘,’, > > ‘;’, ‘asm’ or ‘__attribute__’ before ‘e1000_probe’ > > /home/leopold.palomo/rtnet-code- > > git/drivers/experimental/e1000/e1000_main.c:1499:23: error: expected ‘=’, ‘,’, > > ‘;’, ‘asm’ or ‘__attribute__’ before ‘e1000_remove’ > > /home/leopold.palomo/rtnet-code- > > git/drivers/experimental/e1000/e1000_main.c:1549:22: error: expected ‘=’, ‘,’, > > ‘;’, ‘asm’ or ‘__attribute__’ before ‘e1000_sw_init’ > > /home/leopold.palomo/rtnet-code- > > git/drivers/experimental/e1000/e1000_main.c:1670:22: error: expected ‘=’, ‘,’, > > ‘;’, ‘asm’ or ‘__attribute__’ before ‘e1000_alloc_queues’ > > /home/leopold.palomo/rtnet-code- git/drivers/experimental/e1000/e1000_main.c: > > In function ‘e1000_test_msi_interrupt’: > > /home/leopold.palomo/rtnet-code- > > git/drivers/experimental/e1000/e1000_main.c:1747:20: warning: passing argument > > 2 of ‘request_irq’ from incompatible pointer type [enabled by default] > > In file included from /usr/src/linux-headers-3.8.13- > > xenomai-2.6.3/arch/x86/include/asm/xenomai/wrappers_64.h:29:0, > > from /usr/src/linux-headers-3.8.13- > > xenomai-2.6.3/arch/x86/include/asm/xenomai/wrappers.h:4, > > from /usr/src/linux-headers-3.8.13- > > xenomai-2.6.3/arch/x86/include/asm/xenomai/hal_64.h:34, > > from /usr/src/linux-headers-3.8.13- > > xenomai-2.6.3/arch/x86/include/asm/xenomai/hal.h:81, > > from include/asm-generic/xenomai/system.h:39, > > from /usr/src/linux-headers-3.8.13- > > xenomai-2.6.3/arch/x86/include/asm/xenomai/system.h:34, > > from /lib/modules/3.8.13- > > xenomai-2.6.3/build/include/xenomai/nucleus/types.h:36, > > from /lib/modules/3.8.13- > > xenomai-2.6.3/build/include/xenomai/nucleus/thread.h:25, > > from /lib/modules/3.8.13- > > xenomai-2.6.3/build/include/xenomai/nucleus/sched.h:31, > > from /lib/modules/3.8.13- > > xenomai-2.6.3/build/include/xenomai/nucleus/pod.h:34, > > from /lib/modules/3.8.13- > > xenomai-2.6.3/build/include/xenomai/nucleus/xenomai.h:23, > > from /lib/modules/3.8.13- > > xenomai-2.6.3/build/include/xenomai/rtdm/rtdm_driver.h:37, > > from /home/leopold.palomo/rtnet-code- > > git/stack/include/rtnet.h:99, > > from /home/leopold.palomo/rtnet-code- > > git/stack/include/rtskb.h:32, > > from /home/leopold.palomo/rtnet-code- > > git/stack/include/rtdev.h:37, > > from /home/leopold.palomo/rtnet-code- > > git/stack/include/rtnet_port.h:32, > > from /home/leopold.palomo/rtnet-code- > > git/drivers/experimental/e1000/kcompat.h:52, > > from /home/leopold.palomo/rtnet-code- > > git/drivers/experimental/e1000/e1000.h:35, > > from /home/leopold.palomo/rtnet-code- > > git/drivers/experimental/e1000/e1000_main.c:110: > >
I cannot build almost any driver with 3.8.13 :-( - e1000e - e1000 - experimental .... > I suppose we need to remove the obsolete devinit/devexit tags, just like > in Xenomai. Patches welcome. Ok, I'm a bit afraid because I'm not a driver/kernel developer, but could you explain a bit more what is needed? I have done a grep in the git sources and have found a lot of references of devinit, for example: e1000e/netdev.c:static int __devinit e1000_alloc_queues(struct e1000_adapter *adapter) e1000e/netdev.c:static int __devinit e1000_sw_init(struct e1000_adapter *adapter) e1000e/netdev.c:static int __devinit e1000_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, e1000e/param.c: static int __devinitdata X[E1000_MAX_NIC+1] \ e1000e/param.c:static int __devinit e1000_validate_option(unsigned int *value, e1000e/param.c:void __devinit e1000e_check_options(struct e1000_adapter *adapter) which change should be done? Regards, Leopold -- -- Linux User 152692 Catalonia
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ November Webinars for C, C++, Fortran Developers Accelerate application performance with scalable programming models. Explore techniques for threading, error checking, porting, and tuning. Get the most from the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60136231&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________ RTnet-users mailing list RTnet-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rtnet-users
