El Dimarts, 20 de gener de 2015, a les 08:26:29, Gilles Chanteperdrix va escriure: > On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 08:22:28AM +0100, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote: > > El Dimarts, 20 de gener de 2015, a les 08:15:58, Gilles Chanteperdrix va > > > > escriure: > > > On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 08:11:54AM +0100, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote: > > > > El Dimarts, 20 de gener de 2015, a les 08:07:08, Gilles Chanteperdrix > > > > va > > > > > > > > escriure: > > > > > On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 08:02:29AM +0100, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda > > > > wrote: > > > > > > El Dilluns, 19 de gener de 2015, a les 23:24:57, Gilles > > > > > > Chanteperdrix > > > > > > va > > > > > > > > > > > > escriure: > > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 11:03:19PM +0100, Leopold > > > > > > > Palomo-Avellaneda > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have compiled and created debian packages of xenomai-2.6.4. > > > > > > > > I > > > > > > > > have > > > > > > > > patched the kernel and created debian packages for it. > > > > > > > > (3.16.0) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Xenomai 2.6.4 does not compile with Linux 3.16.0. > > > > > > > > > > > > Gilles, > > > > > > > > > > > > I have seen that Mariusz Janiak sent some patches to solve > > > > > > compilation > > > > > > issues. But my question was about in configure time, not compile > > > > > > time. > > > > > > So, configure doesn't detect the RTOS if it's above 3.14? > > > > > > > > > > I am not talking about RTnet. I am talking about Xenomai. Xenomai > > > > > 2.6.4 can not use Linux kernels higher than 3.14. That is a general > > > > > rule: a Xenomai release generally does not support kernel versions > > > > > higher than the highest one for which it provides patch, 2.6.3 > > > > > having been an exception since the highest patch it provided was for > > > > > Linux 3.8 but it supported the I-pipe patch for Linux 3.10. But this > > > > > exception was explicitly mentioned in the announce. > > > > > > > > Gilles, > > > > > > > > yesterday I downloaded xenomai 2.6.4 and linux-3.16.0 [1]. I used > > > > adeos > > > > patch ipipe-core-3.16-x86-1.patch [2]. > > > > > > > > Xenomai compiled without any issue, The kernel compiled without any > > > > issue. > > > > I could exec: xeno-test. > > > > > > That is strange, because without this commit: > > > https://git.xenomai.org/xenomai-2.6.git/commit/?id=d7f7e99ea19eb0dc13b1e > > > 02e6 33ec53ac9b89475 > > > > > > include/rtdm/rtdm_driver.h references a macro which no longer exists > > > in Linux 3.16. > > > > > > So, maybe you could compile Xenomai because you did not enable any > > > builtin RTDM driver, but you are certainly not going to be able to > > > compile RTnet. > > > > Ok, it has sense now. Probably I did some mistake and I didn't enable some > > driver. I remember that I disable some things. Probably I miss > > something... I tried to follow the wiki rules (yes, sometimes exist some > > user that read the manual and the wikis ;-) > > > > So, and I have read your another mail: > > > > - xenomai git (2.x series, with that commit) compiles with > > linux-3.16? > > It compiles, but it has some issues which are fixed by other commit. > The point I was trying to make is that if you want to use I-pipe > patches of a higher version than the ones in the latest release, you > should use the git.
I got it, I will try. > > - rtnet compiles against xenomai latest git (2.x series) > > No idea, really, I am only interested in 3.x, 2.x series will no > longer evolve now. And again, in 3.x, rtnet is integrated into > xenomai, so much easier to compile. And since you were the one to > ask for rtnet with 3.x, I would expect you to test this integration > ;-) :-D yes you are right. The point is that I live so happy with the debian packages and the infrastructure to build them. 3.x has no it. But you are right. I will need it, so I have to test it... -- -- Linux User 152692 GPG: 05F4A7A949A2D9AA Catalonia ------------------------------------- A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ New Year. New Location. New Benefits. New Data Center in Ashburn, VA. GigeNET is offering a free month of service with a new server in Ashburn. Choose from 2 high performing configs, both with 100TB of bandwidth. Higher redundancy.Lower latency.Increased capacity.Completely compliant. http://p.sf.net/sfu/gigenet
_______________________________________________ RTnet-users mailing list RTnet-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rtnet-users
