Dne 18.7.2011 01:42, TASAKA Mamoru napsal(a): > Mo Morsi wrote, at 07/15/2011 11:15 AM +9:00: >> On 07/13/2011 02:53 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: >>> Hi guys, >>> >>> Since February, there are available RSpec 2.x in Fedora repositories. >>> However, as of now, the main package rubygem-rspec was not migrated to >>> RSpec 2.x and still provides RSpec 1.3 functionality. It would be nice, >>> if we could finish the migration to RSpec 2.x lets say in F17 time >>> frame. What are your opinions? The list of packages which depends on >>> RSpec 1.3 is attached bellow. >>> >> IMO F17 seems like a reasonable timeline for this. At that point we >> might also want to provide a rubygem-rspec1-compat package for any gems >> whose upstream communities haven't switched over. >> > Can't we do this (i.e. rspec 2 by default, rspec 1 move to compat mode) > before F-16/17 branch (i.e. 2011-07-26)?
Is it worth of it? We can push the change right now, but it will make some packages FTBFS. Don't take me wrong, I personally +1 for this change, I just wanted to give a chance to others to be prepared. > I prepared rubygem-rspec-2.6.0 and rubygem-"rspec1"-1.3.2: > http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Trial-rpms/rubygem-rspec-2.6.0-1.fc.src.rpm > http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Trial-rpms/rubygem-rspec1-1.3.2-2.fc.src.rpm > http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Trial-rpms/rubygem-rspec.spec > http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Trial-rpms/rubygem-rspec1.spec Is the change in folder structure, i.e. rename from rspec to rspec1 really necessary? The gems don't conflicts, so it seems to me too much effort for no benefit. > With these rpms, > - people who wants to use rspec 1 has to specify it as > (Build)Requires: rubygem(rspec1), rubygem(rspec), and to use > "gem 'rspec1'", not "gem 'rspec'". /usr/bin/spec remains as before. > - people who want to use rspec 2 will specify it as > (Build)Requires: rubygem(rspec), and "gem 'rspec'". Note that > /usr/bin/rspec is (already) in rubygem-rspec-core-2.6.4. > > If we can agree with these changes, I will submit these specs/srpms for > review requests. > > Regards, > Mamoru > > > _______________________________________________ > ruby-sig mailing list > ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig _______________________________________________ ruby-sig mailing list ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig
