Thanks, all my current SRPMs are here at http://www.sh0n.net/spstarr/fedora-work
Note rubygem-datamapper is now rubygem-data_mapper so ignore the latter SRPM. I believe someone owns rubygem-extlib in EPEL but not for Fedora since it was dropped. I bumped it to .15 and enabled Yard documentation in it. --- On Tue, 7/26/11, Vít Ondruch <[email protected]> wrote: > From: Vít Ondruch <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: Migration from RSpec 1.3 to RSpec 2.x > To: [email protected] > Date: Tuesday, July 26, 2011, 3:35 PM > I will take a look tomorrow on your > rubygem-extlib and will see if that > can work with RSpec 2 > > Vit > > > > Dne 26.7.2011 16:43, Shawn Starr napsal(a): > > I'm not sure on that. I'm just packaging them for > OpenNebula, I have little ruby development experience. I > would need assistance in that effort. > > > > --- On Tue, 7/26/11, Vít Ondruch<[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> From: Vít Ondruch<[email protected]> > >> Subject: Re: Migration from RSpec 1.3 to RSpec > 2.x > >> To: [email protected] > >> Date: Tuesday, July 26, 2011, 7:39 AM > >> Could you please try to migrate them > >> to RSpec 2.x? It should not be a > >> big problem (although I understand that it > requires more > >> work). > >> > >> > >> Vit > >> > >> > >> Dne 25.7.2011 19:01, Shawn Starr napsal(a): > >>> Im about to submit whole bunch of rubygems to > Fedora. > >> Most of them use rspec 1.3. > >>> On Mon Jul 25th, 2011 10:10 AM EDT Mo Morsi > wrote: > >>> > >>>> Since this list is a lot shorter than the > >> corresponding list in Fedora, > >>>> perhaps we can get these package > maintainers to > >> update to RSpec 2. > >>>> Otherwise, perhaps we can leave it in > there as > >> there for now, push the > >>>> rspec-core and other subcomponents to > EPEL, and > >> update the BoxGrinder > >>>> RPM to depend on those subcomponents > instead of > >> rspec itself? > >>>> -Mo > >>>> > >>>> On 07/22/2011 09:18 AM, Marek Goldmann > wrote: > >>>>> For EPEL 6 - exactly 5: > >>>>> > >>>>> $ repoquery --repoid=epel-source > --arch=src > >> --whatrequires 'rubygem(rspec)' > >>>>> rubygem-extlib-0:0.9.13-5.el6.src > >>>>> rubygem-facon-0:0.4.1-2.el6.src > >>>>> rubygem-rack-test-0:0.5.4-1.el6.src > >>>>> rubygem-thin-0:1.2.8-4.el6.src > >>>>> rubygem-uuidtools-0:2.1.1-1.el6.src > >>>>> > >>>>> For EPEL 5 - also 5: > >>>>> > >>>>> $ repoquery --repoid=epel-source > --arch=src > >> --whatrequires 'rubygem(rspec)' > >>>>> rubygem-extlib-0:0.9.13-5.el5.src > >>>>> rubygem-facon-0:0.4.1-2.el5.src > >>>>> rubygem-linode-0:0.6.2-1.el5.src > >>>>> rubygem-thin-0:1.2.8-2.el5.src > >>>>> rubygem-uuidtools-0:2.1.1-2.el5.src > >>>>> > >>>>> --Marek > >>>>> > >>>>> On 22 lip 2011, at 09:48, Vít Ondruch > wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> RSpec 2 as they are in F16 can be > imported > >> into EPEL right now. Any idea > >>>>>> how many packages depends on RSpec > in > >> EPEL? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Vit > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Dne 21.7.2011 20:49, Marek > Goldmann > >> napsal(a): > >>>>>>> There is one more thing: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Now I upgraded to RSpec 2 in > Fedora. I > >> plan to submit BoxGrinder to EPEL 6, but there is > only RSpec > >> 1.3. What would be the approach to bump RSpec > there? > >>>>>>> --Marek > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On 18 lip 2011, at 18:49, Mo > Morsi > >> wrote: > >>>>>>>> Perhaps we can shoot for > doing > >> this w/ F17, and if we are unable to > >>>>>>>> migrate all the dependent > packages > >> over, then add a rspec1 compat > >>>>>>>> package to buy us some > more time. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> In any case, would rather > push > >> this off to F17 myself as a few of us are > >>>>>>>> going through and updating > alot of > >> the rails related plugins to be > >>>>>>>> compatible w/ Rails 3 in > Fedora. > >> We're trying to get this done by the > >>>>>>>> F16 deadline next week. > >>>>>>> --Marek > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >> _______________________________________________ > >>>>>>> ruby-sig mailing list > >>>>>>> [email protected] > >>>>>>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig > >> _______________________________________________ > >>>>>> ruby-sig mailing list > >>>>>> [email protected] > >>>>>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig > >> _______________________________________________ > >>>>> ruby-sig mailing list > >>>>> [email protected] > >>>>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig > >>>> > _______________________________________________ > >>>> ruby-sig mailing list > >>>> [email protected] > >>>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig > >>> > _______________________________________________ > >>> ruby-sig mailing list > >>> [email protected] > >>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig > >> _______________________________________________ > >> ruby-sig mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig > >> > > _______________________________________________ > > ruby-sig mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig > > _______________________________________________ > ruby-sig mailing list > [email protected] > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig > _______________________________________________ ruby-sig mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig
