I'm not sure on that. I'm just packaging them for OpenNebula, I have little ruby development experience. I would need assistance in that effort.
--- On Tue, 7/26/11, Vít Ondruch <[email protected]> wrote: > From: Vít Ondruch <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: Migration from RSpec 1.3 to RSpec 2.x > To: [email protected] > Date: Tuesday, July 26, 2011, 7:39 AM > Could you please try to migrate them > to RSpec 2.x? It should not be a > big problem (although I understand that it requires more > work). > > > Vit > > > Dne 25.7.2011 19:01, Shawn Starr napsal(a): > > Im about to submit whole bunch of rubygems to Fedora. > Most of them use rspec 1.3. > > > > On Mon Jul 25th, 2011 10:10 AM EDT Mo Morsi wrote: > > > >> Since this list is a lot shorter than the > corresponding list in Fedora, > >> perhaps we can get these package maintainers to > update to RSpec 2. > >> > >> Otherwise, perhaps we can leave it in there as > there for now, push the > >> rspec-core and other subcomponents to EPEL, and > update the BoxGrinder > >> RPM to depend on those subcomponents instead of > rspec itself? > >> > >> -Mo > >> > >> On 07/22/2011 09:18 AM, Marek Goldmann wrote: > >>> For EPEL 6 - exactly 5: > >>> > >>> $ repoquery --repoid=epel-source --arch=src > --whatrequires 'rubygem(rspec)' > >>> rubygem-extlib-0:0.9.13-5.el6.src > >>> rubygem-facon-0:0.4.1-2.el6.src > >>> rubygem-rack-test-0:0.5.4-1.el6.src > >>> rubygem-thin-0:1.2.8-4.el6.src > >>> rubygem-uuidtools-0:2.1.1-1.el6.src > >>> > >>> For EPEL 5 - also 5: > >>> > >>> $ repoquery --repoid=epel-source --arch=src > --whatrequires 'rubygem(rspec)' > >>> rubygem-extlib-0:0.9.13-5.el5.src > >>> rubygem-facon-0:0.4.1-2.el5.src > >>> rubygem-linode-0:0.6.2-1.el5.src > >>> rubygem-thin-0:1.2.8-2.el5.src > >>> rubygem-uuidtools-0:2.1.1-2.el5.src > >>> > >>> --Marek > >>> > >>> On 22 lip 2011, at 09:48, Vít Ondruch wrote: > >>> > >>>> RSpec 2 as they are in F16 can be imported > into EPEL right now. Any idea > >>>> how many packages depends on RSpec in > EPEL? > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Vit > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Dne 21.7.2011 20:49, Marek Goldmann > napsal(a): > >>>>> There is one more thing: > >>>>> > >>>>> Now I upgraded to RSpec 2 in Fedora. I > plan to submit BoxGrinder to EPEL 6, but there is only RSpec > 1.3. What would be the approach to bump RSpec there? > >>>>> > >>>>> --Marek > >>>>> > >>>>> On 18 lip 2011, at 18:49, Mo Morsi > wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> Perhaps we can shoot for doing > this w/ F17, and if we are unable to > >>>>>> migrate all the dependent packages > over, then add a rspec1 compat > >>>>>> package to buy us some more time. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> In any case, would rather push > this off to F17 myself as a few of us are > >>>>>> going through and updating alot of > the rails related plugins to be > >>>>>> compatible w/ Rails 3 in Fedora. > We're trying to get this done by the > >>>>>> F16 deadline next week. > >>>>> --Marek > >>>>> > >>>>> > _______________________________________________ > >>>>> ruby-sig mailing list > >>>>> [email protected] > >>>>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig > >>>> > _______________________________________________ > >>>> ruby-sig mailing list > >>>> [email protected] > >>>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig > >>> > _______________________________________________ > >>> ruby-sig mailing list > >>> [email protected] > >>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig > >> _______________________________________________ > >> ruby-sig mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig > > _______________________________________________ > > ruby-sig mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig > > _______________________________________________ > ruby-sig mailing list > [email protected] > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig > _______________________________________________ ruby-sig mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig
