Hey Mo, just googling around randomly, it seems that there are no problems with upgrade to Rails 3.2. I have already built 3.2.3 as an SCL [1] and run it with no problems whatsoever.
Slavek. [1] https://fedorahosted.org/SoftwareCollections/ ----- Original Message ----- > Have there been rails 3.2 rpms built? And what do Rails 3.0 -> 3.2 > upgrade stories look like upstream? Might be worth considering > holding > this off for another Fedora release or two to let things shore up / > settle down. > > -Mo > > On 06/21/2012 10:59 AM, Guillermo Gómez wrote: > > Please do.... :) > > > > honestly im not using rails from fedora, yes its old but we are > > seeing so many releases in such a short time thats challenging to > > keep > > up with 3.2.x , please jump directly to 3.2.6 > > > > Guillermo > > > > On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 2:39 AM, Bohuslav Kabrda > > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> I just created a feature page for Rails 3.2 in Fedora 18 [1] - I > >> figured we will need to update, as the current 3.0 is getting > >> quite old (I'm assuming nobody is against this, right?). I'd be > >> glad if you could give me some comments and suggestions before > >> submitting the feature to FESCo. > >> > >> Thanks. > >> > >> -- > >> Regards, > >> Bohuslav "Slavek" Kabrda. > >> > >> [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Rails_3.2 > >> _______________________________________________ > >> ruby-sig mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > ruby-sig mailing list > [email protected] > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig -- Regards, Bohuslav "Slavek" Kabrda. _______________________________________________ ruby-sig mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig
