Sorry for the belated response. It seems like there are a few API changes but nothing that we can't handle so no objections to updating from here.
-Mo On 06/26/2012 01:39 AM, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote: > Hey Mo, > just googling around randomly, it seems that there are no problems with > upgrade to Rails 3.2. > I have already built 3.2.3 as an SCL [1] and run it with no problems > whatsoever. > > Slavek. > > [1] https://fedorahosted.org/SoftwareCollections/ > > ----- Original Message ----- >> Have there been rails 3.2 rpms built? And what do Rails 3.0 -> 3.2 >> upgrade stories look like upstream? Might be worth considering >> holding >> this off for another Fedora release or two to let things shore up / >> settle down. >> >> -Mo >> >> On 06/21/2012 10:59 AM, Guillermo Gómez wrote: >>> Please do.... :) >>> >>> honestly im not using rails from fedora, yes its old but we are >>> seeing so many releases in such a short time thats challenging to >>> keep >>> up with 3.2.x , please jump directly to 3.2.6 >>> >>> Guillermo >>> >>> On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 2:39 AM, Bohuslav Kabrda >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Hi all, >>>> I just created a feature page for Rails 3.2 in Fedora 18 [1] - I >>>> figured we will need to update, as the current 3.0 is getting >>>> quite old (I'm assuming nobody is against this, right?). I'd be >>>> glad if you could give me some comments and suggestions before >>>> submitting the feature to FESCo. >>>> >>>> Thanks. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Regards, >>>> Bohuslav "Slavek" Kabrda. >>>> >>>> [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Rails_3.2 >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> ruby-sig mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> ruby-sig mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig _______________________________________________ ruby-sig mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig
