On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 03:00:59PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: <snip> >> >And this is even what is in current fedora-review(1) as in its output is: > >[x]: MUST Gem package must exclude cached Gem. > > I already asked to relax this MUST: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848283 > > > > >I do not understand why it is MUST item. And anyway, why it could not be > >present. > > It just consumes space and the functionality it serves is replaced > by RPM functionality.
+1 It strikes me that the gem file itself is fairly redundant on a Fedora system. Does anything in Ruby actually touch the gem? -- Darryl L. Pierce <[email protected]> http://mcpierce.multiply.com/ "What do you care what people think, Mr. Feynman?"
pgpd0WTP3wow0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ruby-sig mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig
