> I realize it’s a big undertaking to do this, but it sucks not to be able to > run tests in %check because of all the breaking changes.
I could also use it already. > I plan to update rspec series to 3.x on F-22 Makes sense to me. We were fixing a lot recently. Josef ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mamoru TASAKA" <[email protected]> To: "Ruby SIG mailing list" <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, 27 June, 2014 4:31:20 PM Subject: Re: RSpec 3 Julian C. Dunn wrote, at 06/27/2014 11:00 PM +9:00: > Hi again, > > I’ve been packaging more and more stuff that is using RSpec 3 in test suites. > We currently have RSpec 2.14.1 even in rawhide. > Is anyone working on an upgrade? Or providing RSpec 3 in parallel? > > I realize it’s a big undertaking to do this, but it sucks not to be able to > run tests in %check because of all the breaking changes. I plan to update rspec series to 3.x on F-22, but not on F-21. When people are working hard to fix FTBFS which already appears on many rubygems related packages, introducing another breakage at this timing is not I am going to do. Perhaps on F-22 I will make compat-package for rspec 2 series (review requests needed, I will create these), and maybe I will keep these compat-package even on F-23. Regards, Mamoru _______________________________________________ ruby-sig mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig _______________________________________________ ruby-sig mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig
