> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1136384 > rubygem-rspec2-expectations > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1136385 rubygem-rspec2-mocks > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1136389 rubygem-rspec2-core > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1136390 rubygem-rspec2
I will look into it. > Swap reviews are welcome! You could help me with those: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1122941 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1122944 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1122939 Thanks Josef ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mamoru TASAKA" <[email protected]> To: "Ruby SIG mailing list" <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, September 2, 2014 3:32:10 PM Subject: Re: RSpec 3 Mamoru TASAKA wrote on 09/02/2014 06:34 AM: > Vít Ondruch wrote on 09/01/2014 10:10 PM: >> Dne 27.6.2014 16:31, Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a): >>> Julian C. Dunn wrote, at 06/27/2014 11:00 PM +9:00: >>>> Hi again, >>>> >>>> I’ve been packaging more and more stuff that is using RSpec 3 in test >>>> suites. We currently have RSpec 2.14.1 even in rawhide. >>>> Is anyone working on an upgrade? Or providing RSpec 3 in parallel? >>>> >>>> I realize it’s a big undertaking to do this, but it sucks not to be >>>> able to run tests in %check because of all the breaking changes. >>> >>> I plan to update rspec series to 3.x on F-22, but not on F-21. When >>> people are working hard >>> to fix FTBFS which already appears on many rubygems related packages, >>> introducing another >>> breakage at this timing is not I am going to do. >>> Perhaps on F-22 I will make compat-package for rspec 2 series (review >>> requests needed, I will >>> create these), and maybe I will keep these compat-package even on F-23. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Mamoru >>> >> >> Hi Mamoru, >> >> What is the state of this affair? Should I prepare updated RSpec 3.x >> packages for review? Or do you have something already? > > Well, srpms are actually ready, just I have to do is to submit them > for review and to look for reviewer. Will do today, so please wait, thank you > for > pinging. Hello, all: Now for F-22 rspec2 (re-)review requests are ready: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1136384 rubygem-rspec2-expectations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1136385 rubygem-rspec2-mocks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1136389 rubygem-rspec2-core https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1136390 rubygem-rspec2 If these reviews pass, I will update rspec suite on F-22 to 3.0.x (i.e. on F-22 rspec 3 series will be default). Note that srpms are ready and if you want to try please feel to take them from: https://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/rspec3/ Swap reviews are welcome! Regards, Mamoru _______________________________________________ ruby-sig mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig _______________________________________________ ruby-sig mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ruby-sig
