Dne 28.3.2017 v 14:57 Pavel Valena napsal(a): > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Jun Aruga" <jar...@redhat.com> >> To: "Ruby SIG mailing list" <ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org> >> Sent: Monday, March 20, 2017 6:46:37 PM >> Subject: Re: Ruby optparser bash completion support >> >> I could understand it. >> That is the reason I said "But it's up to you.". >> >> Jun >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: "Vít Ondruch" <vondr...@redhat.com> >>> To: ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org >>> Sent: Monday, March 20, 2017 6:13:51 PM >>> Subject: Re: Ruby optparser bash completion support >>> >>> >>> >>> Dne 20.3.2017 v 17:20 Jun Aruga napsal(a): >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>>> Should we store the "rb_optparse.bash" somewhere? >>>> It does not matter for me. >>>> >>>> If we provide it, there is a sample in python3 package. >>>> >>>> http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/python3.git/tree/python3.spec >>> This was more rhetoric/abstrac question, because we don't need to use >>> the rb_optparse functionality directly. >>> >>>>> L1467 %doc Misc/README.valgrind Misc/valgrind-python.supp Misc/gdbinit >>>> "Misc" (camel case) is python's directory habit. we should use "misc" >>>> instead of that. >>>> >>>> The package name might be "ruby-misc" or "ruby-tools", or including >>>> "ruby-devel", and etc.. >>>> >>>> misc/ >>>> rb_optparse.bash >>>> rb_optparse.zsh >>>> *.el (emacs macro) >>>> >>>>> Should we try to enable the bash completion for every Ruby executable? >>>>> Should we have some macro for this? >>>> No, "rb_optparse.bash" are not installed when I installed Ruby from >>>> source >>>> with default configure option. >>>> That means that using the file is not common. >>> Well, it is not common because it is not widely known. And we are >>> working on distribution, we know our platform and we have means to >>> provide better integration and user experience. >>> >>> Actually, now I realize that I was not precise enough saying "for every >>> Ruby executable" when I actually assumed executables provided by our >>> packages. But on the other hand, I would love to see this used for every >>> Ruby executable if possible. Why not (except from technical issues, >>> which can be resolved typically)? >>> >>> >>> Vít >>> >>>> But it's up to you. >>>> >>>> Jun Aruga >>>> >>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>>> From: "Vít Ondruch" <vondr...@redhat.com> >>>>> To: "Ruby SIG mailing list" <ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org> >>>>> Sent: Monday, March 20, 2017 3:39:00 PM >>>>> Subject: Ruby optparser bash completion support >>>>> >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> >>>>> For ages, there is Bash/Zsh completion support available for the default >>>>> OptParser [1]. That means quite some Ruby application could provide some >>>>> basic command completion out of the box. However, the setup is a bit >>>>> clumsy. The steps necessary to enable the command completion for single >>>>> executable are described her [2]. Any ideas, how we could benefit from >>>>> this feature? Should we store the "rb_optparse.bash" somewhere? Where to >>>>> load it and how to enable the completion for specific executables? >>>>> Should we try to enable the bash completion for every Ruby executable? > I am not sure if I can be of any help, since I am using zsh on my > systems(with oh-my-zsh to by precise) and I have autocompletion done by some > zsh plugin(s) AFAIK[1].
There is also some ZSH variant: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/blob/trunk/misc/rb_optparse.zsh But it seems a bit more complex ... Vít > And it works really nice for `gem`, `vagrant`, apart from one issue. The > issue occurs when I write `gem unpack ` and then want to select some file by > auto-completion(at that point there's no autocompletion at all). Also if I > install `jekyll` f.e. there is no autocompletion too, so I guess it's working > only for selected executables. > > Personally I would like to have system-wide autocompletion. But for start we > could at least ship it and let users know how to enable it system-wide, or > for specific packages(with some `-autocompletion` package f.e.). > >>>>> Should we have some macro for this? > I think it would be best if the autocompletion is done(prepared) for a > packager seamlessly. > > HIH, > > Pavel > > [1] https://github.com/robbyrussell/oh-my-zsh/tree/master/plugins/gem > _______________________________________________ ruby-sig mailing list -- ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to ruby-sig-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
