Dne 26.4.2017 v 14:06 Dominic Cleal napsal(a): > On 26/04/17 12:24, Vít Ondruch wrote: >> Hi everybody, >> >> As I promised earlier [1], the ruby-sig and ruby-packagers-sig were >> established, together with ruby-packagers-sig mailing list [2]. Not sure >> precisely how this is going to pan out, but lets try this: >> >> 1) I would appreciate if we can transform the list of SIG members [3] >> into the ruby-sig FAS group. Therefore, can I ask interested parties to >> apply for this group in FAS? As soon as you apply, I will sponsor you >> and I'll select a few of you as additional sponsors. > The group's set to invite-only, could you change it in FAS? (Or invite > me, please: username is "domcleal".)
I sponsored you. > >> 2) Any of you who is maintaining some interesting package should think >> about (a) adding ruby-packagers-sig group as a administrator of the >> package (b) consider moving the ownership of the package to >> ruby-packages-sig (but please I hope it won't end up just as a junkyard >> of packages you don't have time to maintain anymore ;) ). As of >> membership in ruby-packagers-sig, I propose that the minimal level for >> sponsoring into this group should be maintenance of 5 ruby related >> package and be packager at least 1 year (possibly with some exception, >> especially for full time maintainers). > I've got nine or so packages I'd be willing to move/co-maintain with the > SIG, though I'm unsure if the admin or ownership should be changed (will > wait for your fedora-infra question to be answered). I sponsored you, but lets see what is the answer ... > > Would setting ownership or admin automatically provide commit access to > members of ruby-packagers-sig? > I assume that once the group is added as an admin of the package, then every member of the group can adjust his/her rights. If the group has commit bit, then every member of the group can commit. If I am right, then it really depends what is the best practice here. Because this means to answer questions such as: "how much credit we want to give each contributor", because somebody might be proud to be listed explicitly as a maintainer and somebody else probably does not care. Vít _______________________________________________ ruby-sig mailing list -- ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to ruby-sig-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
