On 27/04/17 12:10, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
>
> Dne 26.4.2017 v 16:38 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
>> Dne 26.4.2017 v 14:06 Dominic Cleal napsal(a):
>>> Would setting ownership or admin automatically provide commit access to
>>> members of ruby-packagers-sig?
>>>
>> I assume that once the group is added as an admin of the package, then
>> every member of the group can adjust his/her rights. If the group has
>> commit bit, then every member of the group can commit. If I am right,
>> then it really depends what is the best practice here. Because this
>> means to answer questions such as: "how much credit we want to give each
>> contributor", because somebody might be proud to be listed explicitly as
>> a maintainer and somebody else probably does not care.
>
> So if I get this [1] right (and actually I discussed this with Pingou on
> IRC), then the ideal setup should be:
>
> 1) Group cannot be administrator, so there have to be at least one
> explicit "human" administrator (this is to prevent individual from the
> group to take control over the package).
> 2) Group should have commit bit, this allows everybody from the group to
> do changes to package in dist-git.
I wasn't able to set this on rubygem-Ascii85 in PkgDB, it showed an error:
User "ruby-packagers-sig" is not in the packager group
> 3) Group should have "watchbugzilla" to allow group to be notified about
> BZ associated with the package.
And when trying to set just watch*, PkgDB showed another error:
User "ruby-packagers-sig" could not be found in FAS
Have you been able to update ACLs to the group on any packages? I was
using the PkgDB page at
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acl/rpms/rubygem-Ascii85/give/ to
try and grant access.
--
Dominic Cleal
domi...@cleal.org
_______________________________________________
ruby-sig mailing list -- ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to ruby-sig-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
