Thx for a review. So far, it seems we have one blocker [1], which prevents us from rebuilding packages which are using %setup macro for .gem expansion. We are about to revert [2] to unblock the rebuild. We will see what upstream is going to do about it.
Vít [1] https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/issues/2587 [2] https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/pull/2204 Dne 07. 01. 19 v 11:19 Jun Aruga napsal(a): > Hi Vit, > Thanks for that. > I will look at your PR. > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ruby/pull-request/32 > > Jun > > On Fri, Jan 4, 2019 at 4:18 PM Vít Ondruch <vondr...@redhat.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> As planned, Ruby 2.6 was released during Christmas. So I updated my PR >> with the changes required for the official build. There are things which >> could be improved, but there is no blocker IMO (but I have not tested >> the package extensively). So please take look at the PR, here is the >> Koji build (not sure why the koji-simple-ci fails, it seems it somehow >> mangles some dates or ....): >> >> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=31810749 >> >> and here is Copr repo for easier testing: >> >> https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/vondruch/ruby26/ >> >> If there is no issue, I'll ask for side tag and star with rebuild soon. >> Probably next week already unless I am on PTO. Anyway, mass rebuild is >> scheduled on 30th of January (unless I am mistaken), so everything >> should land in Fedora prior that date. >> >> >> Best, >> >> >> Vít >> >> >> Dne 16. 11. 18 v 17:43 Vít Ondruch napsal(a): >>> Hi everybody, >>> >>> I just created PR with .spec file updated to build Ruby 2.6.0.preview3: >>> >>> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ruby/pull-request/32 >>> >>> It is very much WIP, but it builds at least. I have even not tried to >>> install or run the package. Pagure is so nice, that it should provide >>> the recent scratch builds via simple-koji-ci, so I am not going to link >>> it here. >>> >>> So far, there are 3 things missing/ignored: >>> >>> 1. Bundler is completely removed. I am afraid the situation has not >>> improved much since last year. E.g. Molinillo, the dependency solver is >>> included in Ruby twice, once via RubyGems, second time via Bundler, etc. >>> not nice. >>> >>> 2. IRB was gemified, therefore it should be moved into rubygem- >>> subpackage and the original ruby-irb should be obsoleted. >>> >>> 3. I am still undecided how to go forward with JIT. It requires compiler >>> and it has to be explicitly required, therefore we should do nothing >>> IMO. Later, we should probably Suggest or even Require the compiler? Not >>> sure. >>> >>> And as always, please let me know any feedback, either here or in PR. >>> >>> >>> Best, >>> >>> >>> Vít >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> ruby-sig mailing list -- ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org >>> To unsubscribe send an email to ruby-sig-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org >>> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html >>> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines >>> List Archives: >>> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org >> _______________________________________________ >> ruby-sig mailing list -- ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org >> To unsubscribe send an email to ruby-sig-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org >> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html >> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines >> List Archives: >> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org > > _______________________________________________ ruby-sig mailing list -- ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to ruby-sig-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
